Learning to Reason with Insight for Informal Theorem Proving
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Although most of the automated theorem-proving approaches depend on formal proof systems, informal theorem proving can align better with large language models' (LLMs) strength in natural language processing. In this work, we identify a primary bottleneck in informal theorem proving as a lack of insight, namely the difficulty of recognizing the core techniques required to solve complex problems. To address this, we propose textttDeepInsight, a unified training framework designed to cultivate this essential reasoning skill and enable LLMs to perform insightful reasoning. Our framework consists of three components: (1) textttDeepInsightTheorem, a hierarchical dataset that structures informal proofs by explicitly extracting core techniques and proof sketches alongside the final proof; (2) a Progressive Multi-Stage SFT strategy that mimics the human learning process, teaching the model proof writing, planning, and insight identification; and (3) textttInsightPO, a policy optimization method that assigns structured rewards over this insight hierarchy. Our experiments on challenging mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that this insight-aware generation strategy significantly outperforms baselines. These results demonstrate that teaching models to identify and apply core techniques can substantially improve their mathematical reasoning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.
Builds on
16 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Solving Inequality Proofs with Large Language Models9 Jun
- 2025DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learning29 May
- 2024Formal Theorem Proving by Rewarding LLMs to Decompose Proofs Hierarchically4 Nov
- 2024Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving14 Jul
Other references · 12
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
- 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
- 2025Hierarchical Reasoning Modelcited by 177
- 2024Self-Discover: Large Language Models Self-Compose Reasoning Structurescited by 110
- 2025ReasonFlux: Hierarchical LLM Reasoning via Scaling Thought Templatescited by 63
- 2025Hierarchical Memory for High-Efficiency Long-Term Reasoning in LLM Agentscited by 62
- 2023FIMO: A Challenge Formal Dataset for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 55
- 2024Learning Formal Mathematics From Intrinsic Motivationcited by 45
- 2024miniCTX: Neural Theorem Proving with (Long-)Contextscited by 37
- 2025HyperTree Planning: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Hierarchical Thinkingcited by 14
- 2025Beyond Fast and Slow: Cognitive-Inspired Elastic Reasoning for Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Data
- 2025DeepSeek-Prover-V2: Advancing Formal Mathematical Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning for Subgoal Decomposition
- 2025Towards Solving More Challenging IMO Problems via Decoupled Reasoning and Proving
- 2025Steering LLMs for Formal Theorem Proving
- 2025Can Large Language Models Learn Formal Logic? A Data-Driven Training and Evaluation Framework
- 2025ProofCompass: Enhancing Specialized Provers with LLM Guidance
- 2025Spark-Prover-X1: Formal Theorem Proving Through Diverse Data Training
- 2024DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search