mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stargazer: A Scalable Model-Fitting Benchmark Environment for AI Agents under Astrophysical Constraints

arXiv 2604.15664 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rise of autonomous AI agents suggests that dynamic benchmark environments with built-in feedback on scientifically grounded tasks are needed to evaluate the capabilities of these agents in research work. We introduce Stargazer, a scalable environment for evaluating AI agents on dynamic, iterative physics-grounded model-fitting tasks using inference on radial-velocity (RV) time series data. Stargazer comprises 120 tasks across three difficulty tiers, including 20 real archival cases, covering diverse scenarios ranging from high-SNR single-planet systems to complex multi-planetary configurations requiring involved low-SNR analysis. Our evaluation of eight frontier agents reveals a gap between numerical optimization and adherence to physical constraints: although agents often achieve a good statistical fit, they frequently fail to recover correct physical system parameters, a limitation that persists even when agents are equipped with vanilla skills. Furthermore, increasing test-time compute yields only marginal gains, with excessive token usage often reflecting recursive failure loops rather than meaningful exploration. Stargazer presents an opportunity to train, evaluate, scaffold, and scale strategies on a model-fitting problem of practical research relevance today. Our methodology to design a simulation-driven environment for AI agents presumably generalizes to many other model-fitting problems across scientific domains. Source code and the project website are available at https://github.com/AIPS-UofT/Stargazer and https://aips-uoft.github.io/Stargazer/, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 51 references.

References · 17

  1. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  2. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  3. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 467
  4. 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 246
  5. 2024SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientistscited by 172
  6. 2024CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmarkcited by 115
  7. 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
  8. 2025UGPhysics: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Undergraduate Physics Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 45
  9. 2025SeePhys: Does Seeing Help Thinking? -- Benchmarking Vision-Based Physics Reasoningcited by 32
  10. 2025Probing the Critical Point (CritPt) of AI Reasoning: a Frontier Physics Research Benchmarkcited by 16
  11. 2025Gravity-Bench-v1: A Benchmark on Gravitational Physics Discovery for Agentscited by 13
  12. 2025AstroVisBench: A Code Benchmark for Scientific Computing and Visualization in Astronomycited by 13
5 more
  1. 2026Solving an Open Problem in Theoretical Physics using AI-Assisted Discoverycited by 7
  2. 2025PRISM-Physics: Causal DAG-Based Process Evaluation for Physics Reasoningcited by 4
  3. 2025AstroMMBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models Capabilities in Astronomycited by 3
  4. 2016Probabilistic Cross-Identification in Crowded Fields as an Assignment Problemcited by 1
  5. 2026AstroReason-Bench: Evaluating Unified Agentic Planning across Heterogeneous Space Planning Problemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Competing with AI Scientists: Agent-Driven Approach to Astrophysics Research
  2. 2025PhysMaster: Building an Autonomous AI Physicist for Theoretical and Computational Physics Research
  3. 2026Plausible but Wrong: A case study on Agentic Failures in Astrophysical Workflows
  4. 2026AIRS-Bench: a Suite of Tasks for Frontier AI Research Science Agents
  5. 2026MDGYM: Benchmarking AI Agents on Molecular Simulations
  6. 2026AutoWorldModel-Bench: A State-Centric Benchmark for Automated World-Model Research
  7. 2025AstaBench: Rigorous Benchmarking of AI Agents with a Scientific Research Suite
  8. 2025The AI Cosmologist I: An Agentic System for Automated Data Analysis