Segment-Level Coherence for Robust Harmful Intent Probing in LLMs
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly exposed to adaptive jailbreaking, particularly in high-stakes Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) domains. Although streaming probes enable real-time monitoring, they still make systematic errors. We identify a core issue: existing methods often rely on a few high-scoring tokens, leading to false alarms when sensitive CBRN terms appear in benign contexts. To address this, we introduce a streaming probing objective that requires multiple evidence tokens to consistently support a prediction, rather than relying on isolated spikes. This encourages more robust detection based on aggregated signals instead of single-token cues. At a fixed 1% false-positive rate, our method improves the true-positive rate by 35.55% relative to strong streaming baselines. We further observe substantial gains in AUROC, even when starting from near-saturated baseline performance (AUROC = 97.40%). We also show that probing Attention or MLP activations consistently outperforms residual-stream features. Finally, even when adversarial fine-tuning enables novel character-level ciphers, harmful intent remains detectable: probes developed for the base LLMs can be applied ``plug-and-play'' to these obfuscated attacks, achieving an AUROC of over 98.85%.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 28 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
28 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Constitutional Classifiers++: Efficient Production-Grade Defenses against Universal Jailbreaks8 Jan
- 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teaming31 Jan
- 2024Badllama 3: removing safety finetuning from Llama 3 in minutes1 Jul
- 2024SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical Manner8 Jun
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
Other references · 23
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 302
- 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 240
- 2024ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemmacited by 224
11 more
- 2024LlaSMol: Advancing Large Language Models for Chemistry with a Large-Scale, Comprehensive, High-Quality Instruction Tuning Datasetcited by 124
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 109
- 2023Use of LLMs for Illicit Purposes: Threats, Prevention Measures, and Vulnerabilitiescited by 76
- 2024Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptationcited by 74
- 2025Training a Scientific Reasoning Model for Chemistrycited by 54
- 2025Detecting High-Stakes Interactions with Activation Probescited by 45
- 2024Obfuscated Activations Bypass LLM Latent-Space Defensescited by 40
- 2026Building Production-Ready Probes For Geminicited by 38
- 2024DiaSynth: Synthetic Dialogue Generation Framework for Low Resource Dialogue Applicationscited by 18
- 2025ChemPile: A 250GB Diverse and Curated Dataset for Chemical Foundation Modelscited by 7
- 2025Neural Chameleons: Language Models Can Learn to Hide Their Thoughts from Unseen Activation Monitorscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026The Entanglement Wall: Activation-Space Probes as Risk Detectors, Not Context Adjudicatorscited by 2
- 2026Closing the Activation-Cone Blind Spot: Response-Time Probing and Unified Defensecited by 0
- 2026RepBench: Compiling Benchmarks into Capability Representations for Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026RepBench: Compiling Benchmarks into Capability Representations for Large Language Models30 Jul 2026
- 2026The Entanglement Wall: Activation-Space Probes as Risk Detectors, Not Context Adjudicators12 Jul 2026
- 2026Closing the Activation-Cone Blind Spot: Response-Time Probing and Unified Defense28 Jun 2026