Batch Effects In Brain Foundation Model Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models show strong potential for large-scale, high-dimensional biomedical applications, yet their ability to capture relevant neurobiological characteristics remains underexplored. We systematically evaluate embeddings from two neuroimaging foundation models, BrainLM and SwiFT, across multi-site fMRI datasets using a comprehensive evaluation framework. Our results show that foundation model embeddings encode substantial batch-related variability, often dominating diagnosis-related information across heterogeneous datasets. We further investigate how harmonization, applied to reduce batch effects, influences these embeddings. In addition, we find that BrainLM prefers to capture fine-grained regional activity, whereas SwiFT tends to represent interactions between regions, consistent with their respective model architectures. Our study highlights the importance of accounting for batch effects in foundation models and motivates future work on disentangling biologically meaningful signals from acquisition-related variability.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Cross-Cohort Spectral-Temporal Dissociation in Frozen EEG Foundation-Model Representationscited by 1
- 2026Dataset-Specific Encoding of Image Content Underlies Cross-Dataset Failure in Brain MRI Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026When Participant Disjoint Validation Is Not Enough to Establish Generalization in Parkinson's Gait Classificationcited by 0
- 2026When Participant Disjoint Validation Is Not Enough to Establish Generalization in Parkinson's Gait Classification12 Oct 2026
- 2026Dataset-Specific Encoding of Image Content Underlies Cross-Dataset Failure in Brain MRI Foundation Models9 Oct 2026
- 2026Cross-Cohort Spectral-Temporal Dissociation in Frozen EEG Foundation-Model Representations23 Jul 2026