Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Runtime Safety Shielding for Power Grid Operation
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for energy, networks and operations
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning has shown promise for automating power-grid operation tasks such as topology control and congestion management. However, its deployment in real-world power systems remains limited by strict safety requirements, brittleness under rare disturbances, and poor generalization to unseen grid topologies. In safety-critical infrastructure, catastrophic failures cannot be tolerated, and learning-based controllers must operate within hard physical constraints. This paper proposes a safety-constrained hierarchical control framework for power-grid operation that explicitly decouples long-horizon decision-making from real-time feasibility enforcement. A high-level reinforcement learning policy proposes abstract control actions, while a deterministic runtime safety shield filters unsafe actions using fast forward simulation. Safety is enforced as a runtime invariant, independent of policy quality or training distribution. The proposed framework is evaluated on the Grid2Op benchmark suite under nominal conditions, forced line-outage stress tests, and zero-shot deployment on the ICAPS 2021 large-scale transmission grid without retraining. Results show that flat reinforcement learning policies are brittle under stress, while safety-only methods are overly conservative. In contrast, the proposed hierarchical and safety-aware approach achieves longer episode survival, lower peak line loading, and robust zero-shot generalization to unseen grids. These results indicate that safety and generalization in power-grid control are best achieved through architectural design rather than increasingly complex reward engineering, providing a practical path toward deployable learning-based controllers for real-world energy systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
5 of 17 references.
References · 5
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 983
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 449
- 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 372
- 2019Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 291
- 2021Learning to run a Power Network Challenge: a Retrospective Analysiscited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning Methods for Modern Power Systems
- 2024A Critical Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning Techniques in Smart Grid Applications
- 2024Safe Reinforcement Learning for Power System Control: A Review
- 2026LLM-Guided Safe Reinforcement Learning for Energy System Topology Reconfiguration ↗
- 2025Safe Reinforcement Learning-based Automatic Generation Control
- 2026Reinforcement Learning for Public Safety Power Shutoffs Under Decision-Dependent Uncertainty and Nonlinear Wildfire Ignition Models
- 2026Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning for Building Heating Control and Demand-side Flexibility
- 2024Make Safe Decisions in Power System: Safe Reinforcement Learning Based Pre-decision Making for Voltage Stability Emergency Control