Creo: From One-Shot Image Generation to Progressive, Co-Creative Ideation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-to-image (T2I) systems enable rapid generation of high-fidelity imagery but are misaligned with how visual ideas develop. T2I systems generate outputs that make implicit visual decisions on behalf of the user, often introduce fine-grained details that can anchor users prematurely and limit their ability to keep options open early on, and cause unintended changes during editing that are difficult to correct and reduce users' sense of control. To address these concerns, we present Creo, a multi-stage T2I system that scaffolds image generation by progressing from rough sketches to high-resolution outputs, exposing intermediary abstractions where users can make incremental changes. Sketch-like abstractions invite user editing and allow users to keep design options open when ideas are still forming due to their provisional nature. Each stage in Creo can be modified with manual changes and AI-assisted operations, enabling fine-grained, step-wise control through a locking mechanism that preserves prior decisions so subsequent edits affect only specified regions or attributes. Users remain in the loop, making and verifying decisions across stages, while the system applies diffs instead of regenerating full images, reducing drift as fidelity increases. A comparative study with a one-shot baseline shows that participants felt stronger ownership over Creo outputs, as they were able to trace their decisions in building up the image. Furthermore, embedding-based analysis indicates that Creo outputs are less homogeneous than one-shot results. These findings suggest that multi-stage generation, combined with intermediate control and decision locking, is a key design principle for improving controllability, user agency, creativity, and output diversity in generative systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
14 of 65 references.
References · 14
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,564
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,339
- 2022Sketch-Guided Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 180
- 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 166
- 2023Bridging the Gulf of Envisioning: Cognitive Design Challenges in LLM Interfacescited by 72
- 2024Magic Fixup: Streamlining Photo Editing by Watching Dynamic Videoscited by 38
- 2024The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent Thinkingcited by 37
- 2024SketchAgent: Language-Driven Sequential Sketch Generationcited by 30
- 2020Why Do Line Drawings Work? A Realism Hypothesiscited by 28
- 2019An Interaction Framework for Studying Co-Creative AIcited by 19
- 2024Block and Detail: Scaffolding Sketch-to-Image Generationcited by 9
- 2025Instance Segmentation of Scene Sketches Using Natural Image Priorscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Alignment has a Fantasia Problemcited by 0
- 2026Alignment has a Fantasia Problem23 Apr 2026