Breaking the Generator Barrier: Disentangled Representation for Generalizable AI-Text Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) generate text that increasingly resembles human writing, the subtle cues that distinguish AI-generated content from human-written content become increasingly challenging to capture. Reliance on generator-specific artifacts is inherently unstable, since new models emerge rapidly and reduce the robustness of such shortcuts. This generalizes unseen generators as a central and challenging problem for AI-text detection. To tackle this challenge, we propose a progressively structured framework that disentangles AI-detection semantics from generator-aware artifacts. This is achieved through a compact latent encoding that encourages semantic minimality, followed by perturbation-based regularization to reduce residual entanglement, and finally a discriminative adaptation stage that aligns representations with task objectives. Experiments on MAGE benchmark, covering 20 representative LLMs across 7 categories, demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to 24.2% accuracy gain and 26.2% F1 improvement. Notably, performance continues to improve as the diversity of training generators increases, confirming strong scalability and generalization in open-set scenarios. Our source code will be publicly available at https://github.com/PuXiao06/DRGD.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2026.
Builds on
21 of 42 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 207
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 187
- 2018Domain Generalization via Conditional Invariant Representationcited by 146
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 130
9 more
- 2023Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulationcited by 98
- 2023HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT-generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysiscited by 30
- 2024Ten Words Only Still Help: Improving Black-Box AI-Generated Text Detection via Proxy-Guided Efficient Re-Samplingcited by 20
- 2025AdaDetectGPT: Adaptive Detection of LLM-Generated Text with Statistical Guaranteescited by 20
- 2024Are AI-Generated Text Detectors Robust to Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 16
- 2022Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text Classificationcited by 13
- 2024Does DetectGPT Fully Utilize Perturbation? Bridging Selective Perturbation to Fine-tuned Contrastive Learning Detector would be Bettercited by 11
- 2025Iron Sharpens Iron: Defending Against Attacks in Machine-Generated Text Detection with Adversarial Trainingcited by 9
- 2025Guided Perturbation Sensitivity (GPS): Detecting Adversarial Text via Embedding Stability and Word Importancecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.