mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Uniform Sampling: Synergistic Active Learning and Input Denoising for Robust Neural Operators

arXiv 2604.13316 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate models for physics simulations, yet they remain acutely vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, a critical liability for safety-critical digital twin deployments. We present a synergistic defense that combines active learning-based data generation with an input denoising architecture. The active learning component adaptively probes model weaknesses using differential evolution attacks, then generates targeted training data at discovered vulnerability locations while an adaptive smooth-ratio safeguard preserves baseline accuracy. The input denoising component augments the operator architecture with a learnable bottleneck that filters adversarial noise while retaining physics-relevant features. On the viscous Burgers' equation benchmark, the combined approach achieves a 2.04% combined error (1.21% baseline + 0.83% robustness), representing an 87% reduction relative to standard training (15.42% combined) and outperforming both active learning alone (3.42%) and input denoising alone (5.22%). More broadly, our results, combined with cross-architecture vulnerability analysis from prior work, suggest that optimal training data for neural operators is architecture-dependent: because different architectures concentrate sensitivity in distinct input subspaces, uniform sampling cannot adequately cover the vulnerability landscape of all models. These findings have potential implications for the deployment of neural operators in safety-critical energy systems including nuclear reactor monitoring.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2026.

Builds on

16 of 18 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  5. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  6. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  7. 2018Regularisation of Neural Networks by Enforcing Lipschitz Continuitycited by 311
  8. 2023Fourier-DeepONet: Fourier-enhanced deep operator networks for full waveform inversion with improved accuracy, generalizability, and robustnesscited by 60
  9. 2021Online Adversarial Purification based on Self-Supervisioncited by 45
  10. 2023Deep Neural Operator Driven Real Time Inference for Nuclear Systems to Enable Digital Twin Solutionscited by 22
  11. 2023Improved generalization with deep neural operators for engineering systems: Path towards digital twincited by 19
  12. 2024Virtual Sensing-Enabled Digital Twin Framework for Real-Time Monitoring of Nuclear Systems Leveraging Deep Neural Operatorscited by 12
4 more
  1. 2025From Proxies to Fields: Spatiotemporal Reconstruction of Global Radiation from Sparse Sensor Sequencescited by 6
  2. 2026Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Neural Operator Digital Twins: Gradient-Free Attacks on Nuclear Thermal-Hydraulic Surrogatescited by 3
  3. 2022Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness for Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 2
  4. 2025Distribution-Free Uncertainty-Aware Virtual Sensing via Conformalized Neural Operatorscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.