mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Seeing it to Experiencing it: Interactive Evaluation of Intersectional Voice Bias in Human-AI Speech Interaction

arXiv 2604.13067 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2026cs.HC cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

SpeechLLMs process spoken language directly from audio, but accent and vocal identity cues can lead to biased behaviour. Current bias evaluations often miss how such bias manifests in end-to-end speech interactions and how users experience it. We distinguish quality-of-service disparities (e.g., off-topic or low-effort responses) from content-level bias in coherent outputs, and examine intersectional effects of accent and perceived gender. In this work, we explore a two-part evaluation approach: (1) a controlled test cohort spanning six accents and two gender presentations, analysed with judge-free prompt-response metrics, and (2) an interactive study design using voice conversion to let users experience identical content through different vocal identities. Across two studies (Interactive, N=24; Observational, N=19), we find that voice conversion increases trust and acceptability for benign responses and encourages perspective-taking, while automated analysis in search of quality-of-service disparities, reveals {accent x gender} disparities in alignment and verbosity across SpeechLLMs. These results highlight voice conversion for probing and experiencing intersectional voice bias while our evaluation suite provides richer bias evaluations for spoken conversational AI.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 30 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020An Overview of Voice Conversion and its Challenges: From Statistical Modeling to Deep Learningcited by 111
  2. 2024Zero-shot Voice Conversion with Diffusion Transformerscited by 39
  3. 2025MegaTTS 3: Sparse Alignment Enhanced Latent Diffusion Transformer for Zero-Shot Speech Synthesiscited by 39
  4. 2023The Edinburgh International Accents of English Corpus: Towards the Democratization of English ASRcited by 36
  5. 2024Dialect prejudice predicts AI decisions about people's character, employability, and criminalitycited by 35
  6. 2023Aleatoric and Epistemic Discrimination: Fundamental Limits of Fairness Interventionscited by 19
  7. 2025Do Bias Benchmarks Generalise? Evidence from Voice-based Evaluation of Gender Bias in SpeechLLMscited by 7
  8. 2025Fairness of Automatic Speech Recognition: Looking Through a Philosophical Lenscited by 5
  9. 2025Evaluating Bias in Spoken Dialogue LLMs for Real-World Decisions and Recommendationscited by 5
  10. 2025Lost in Phonation: Voice Quality Variation as an Evaluation Dimension for Speech Foundation Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.