mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spatial Atlas: Compute-Grounded Reasoning for Spatial-Aware Research Agent Benchmarks

arXiv 2604.12102 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

We describe compute-grounded reasoning (CGR), a design pattern in which code computes selected sub-problems from explicit intermediate representations before a language model answers. Spatial Atlas implements CGR as an Agent2Agent (A2A) server with a spatial question-answering handler and a machine-learning engineering handler. The spatial handler asks a language model to extract a scene graph, and code then fills in missing distances and checks the extracted safety rules. A separate benchmark driver can also run a strict metric bridge. It computes the gap for horizontal-gap questions from segmentation masks and a reconstructed point map, and it passes that gap to the answering model as a fact. The bridge returns a fixed unavailable answer when an evidence check fails, and it never falls back to model-estimated coordinates. The ML-engineering handler generates pipeline code, parses validation scores, and caps the number of repair and refinement passes. Its code execution is off by default. The repository also provides four run modes that can write label-free journals, a shuffled-image control mapping, and journal validators that reject label-bearing fields. We report one private label-free operational run in which four paths each wrote eight prediction rows with zero retries. Labels stayed sealed, and no score was computed, so this run establishes operational integrity only. We report no FieldWorkArena result because the benchmark data were not accessible. We also omit every performance, latency, and resource-use number that lacks a reproducible run artifact.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

24 of 49 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models15 Sep
  2. 2024SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities22 Jan

Other references · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  5. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  6. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  7. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  8. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  9. 2025SAM 3: Segment Anything with Conceptscited by 835
  10. 2025Depth Anything 3: Recovering the Visual Space from Any Viewscited by 626
  11. 2017Scene Graph Generation by Iterative Message Passingcited by 462
  12. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 429
10 more
  1. 2023Florence-2: Advancing a Unified Representation for a Variety of Vision Taskscited by 403
  2. 2020AutoGluon-Tabular: Robust and Accurate AutoML for Structured Datacited by 368
  3. 2020Auto-Sklearn 2.0: Hands-free AutoML via Meta-Learningcited by 174
  4. 2023Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Modelscited by 154
  5. 2023Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature Engineeringcited by 125
  6. 2020Scene Graph Reasoning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 49
  7. 2022Towards a Tighter Bound on Possible-Rendezvous Areas: Preliminary Resultscited by 9
  8. 2023Spatial Computing Opportunities in Biomedical Decision Support: The Atlas-EHR Visioncited by 7
  9. 2025FieldWorkArena: Agentic AI Benchmark for Real Field Work Taskscited by 6
  10. 2024Towards Spatially-Lucid AI Classification in Non-Euclidean Space: An Application for MxIF Oncology Datacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ChainSpace: A Chained-Reasoning Paradigm for Spatial Intelligence
  2. 2026Spatial-Agent: Agentic Geo-spatial Reasoning with Scientific Core Concepts
  3. 2026SpatialWorld: Benchmarking Interactive Spatial Reasoning of Multimodal Agents in Real-World Tasks
  4. 2026SpatiO: Adaptive Test-Time Orchestration of Vision-Language Agents for Spatial Reasoning
  5. 2024GRASP: A Grid-Based Benchmark for Evaluating Commonsense Spatial Reasoning
  6. 2026SpatialClaw: Rethinking Action Interface for Agentic Spatial Reasoning
  7. 2025SpatialThinker: Reinforcing Scene Graph-Grounded Spatial Reasoning via Dense Rewards
  8. 2025Schema-Guided Scene-Graph Reasoning based on Multi-Agent Large Language Model System