TriFit: Trimodal Fusion with Protein Dynamics for Mutation Fitness Prediction
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Medical and biomedical MoE
Abstract (arXiv)
Predicting the functional impact of single amino acid substitutions (SAVs) is central to understanding genetic disease and engineering therapeutic proteins. While protein language models and structure-based methods have achieved strong performance on this task, they systematically neglect protein dynamics; residue flexibility, correlated motions, and allosteric coupling are well-established determinants of mutational tolerance in structural biology, yet have not been incorporated into supervised variant effect predictors. We present TriFit, a multimodal framework that integrates sequence, structure, and protein dynamics through a four-expert Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) fusion module with trimodal cross-modal contrastive learning. Sequence embeddings are extracted via masked marginal scoring with ESM-2 (650M); structural embeddings from AlphaFold2-predicted C-alpha geometries; and dynamics embeddings from Gaussian Network Model (GNM) B-factors, mode shapes, and residue-residue cross-correlations. The MoE router adaptively weights modality combinations conditioned on the input, enabling protein-specific fusion without fixed modality assumptions. On the ProteinGym substitution benchmark (217 DMS assays, 696k SAVs), TriFit achieves AUROC 0.897 +/- 0.0002, outperforming all supervised baselines including Kermut (0.864) and ProteinNPT (0.844), and the best zero-shot model ESM3 (0.769). Ablation studies confirm that dynamics provides the largest marginal contribution over pairwise modality combinations, and TriFit achieves well-calibrated probabilistic outputs (ECE = 0.044) without post-hoc correction.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and biomedical MoE, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 3 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.
Builds on
3 of 22 references.
References · 3
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2020Learning from Protein Structure with Geometric Vector Perceptronscited by 308
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Evolutionary Profiles for Protein Fitness Prediction
- 2026From Snapshots to Symphonies: The Evolution of Protein Prediction from Static Structures to Generative Dynamics and Multimodal Interactions
- 2024MutaPLM: Protein Language Modeling for Mutation Explanation and Engineering
- 2026PFArena: Benchmarking Language Models for Protein Modification
- 2026Rank-and-Reason: Multi-Agent Collaboration Accelerates Zero-Shot Protein Mutation Prediction
- 2025Understanding protein function with a multimodal retrieval-augmented foundation model
- 2023Predicting mutational effects on protein-protein binding via a side-chain diffusion probabilistic model
- 2025AMix-1: A Pathway to Test-Time Scalable Protein Foundation Model