UCS: Estimating Unseen Coverage for Improved In-Context Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In-context learning (ICL) performance depends critically on which demonstrations are placed in the prompt, yet most existing selectors prioritize heuristic notions of relevance or diversity and provide limited insight into the coverage of a demonstration set. We propose Unseen Coverage Selection (UKS), a training-free, subset-level coverage prior motivated by the principle that a good demonstration set should expose the model to latent cluster unrevealed by the currently selected subset. UCS operationalizes this idea by (1) inducing discrete latent clusters from model-consistent embeddings and (2) estimating the number of unrevealed clusters within a candidate subset via a Smoothed Good--Turing estimator from its empirical frequency spectrum. Unlike previous selection methods, UCS is coverage-based and training-free, and can be seamlessly combined with both query-dependent and query-independent selection baselines via a simple regularized objective. Experiments on multiple intent-classification and reasoning benchmarks with frontier Large Language Models show that augmenting strong baselines with UCS consistently improves ICL accuracy by up to 2-6% under the same selection budget, while also yielding insights into task- and model-level latent cluster distributions. Code is available at https://github.com/Raina-Xin/UCS.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.
Builds on
21 of 39 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
- 2021MetaICL: Learning to Learn In Contextcited by 450
- 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 419
- 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 378
- 2022In-context Examples Selection for Machine Translationcited by 172
- 2019Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for building Conversational Agentscited by 166
- 2022Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An Information Compression Perspective for In-Context Example Selection and Orderingcited by 158
- 2023Compositional Exemplars for In-context Learningcited by 143
9 more
- 2022Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional Generalizationcited by 136
- 2023In-Context Learning with Iterative Demonstration Selectioncited by 74
- 2022Complementary Explanations for Effective In-Context Learningcited by 71
- 2023Dr.ICL: Demonstration-Retrieved In-context Learningcited by 71
- 2023Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 58
- 2024Revisiting Demonstration Selection Strategies in In-Context Learningcited by 57
- 2023OpenICL: An Open-Source Framework for In-context Learningcited by 51
- 2023Skill-Based Few-Shot Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 46
- 2024In-Context Learning Demonstration Selection via Influence Analysiscited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.