mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Efficient KernelSHAP Explanations for Patch-based 3D Medical Image Segmentation

arXiv 2604.11775 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perturbation-based explainability methods such as KernelSHAP provide model-agnostic attributions but are typically impractical for patch-based 3D medical image segmentation due to the large number of coalition evaluations and the high cost of sliding-window inference. We present an efficient KernelSHAP framework for volumetric CT segmentation that restricts computation to a user-defined region of interest and its receptive-field support, and accelerates inference via patch logit caching, reusing baseline predictions for unaffected patches while preserving nnU-Net's fusion scheme. To enable clinically meaningful attributions, we compare three automatically generated feature abstractions within the receptive-field crop: whole-organ units, regular FCC supervoxels, and hybrid organ-aware supervoxels, and we study multiple aggregation/value functions targeting stabilizing evidence (TP/Dice/Soft Dice) or false-positive behavior. Experiments on whole-body CT segmentations show that caching substantially reduces redundant computation (with computational savings ranging from 15% to 30%) and that faithfulness and interpretability exhibit clear trade-offs: regular supervoxels often maximize perturbation-based metrics but lack anatomical alignment, whereas organ-aware units yield more clinically interpretable explanations and are particularly effective for highlighting false-positive drivers under normalized metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 25 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  4. 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
  5. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
  6. 2013SEEDS: Superpixels Extracted via Energy-Driven Samplingcited by 75
  7. 2020Towards Interpretable Semantic Segmentation via Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mappingcited by 49
  8. 2019Grid Saliency for Context Explanations of Semantic Segmentationcited by 32
  9. 2024Explainable AI (XAI) in Image Segmentation in Medicine, Industry, and Beyond: A Surveycited by 11
  10. 2024Normalized AOPC: Fixing Misleading Faithfulness Metrics for Feature Attribution Explainabilitycited by 10
  11. 2021U-Noise: Learnable Noise Masks for Interpretable Image Segmentationcited by 9
  12. 2024Beyond Pixels: Enhancing LIME with Hierarchical Features and Segmentation Foundation Modelscited by 8
5 more
  1. 2024Aggregated Attributions for Explanatory Analysis of 3D Segmentation Modelscited by 5
  2. 2024MiSuRe is all you need to explain your image segmentationcited by 3
  3. 2025Extending SEEDS to a Supervoxel Algorithm for Medical Image Analysiscited by 2
  4. 2023FM-G-CAM: A Holistic Approach for Explainable AI in Computer Visioncited by 1
  5. 2024Investigating Gender Bias in Lymph-node Segmentation with Anatomical Priorscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.