mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ConvFormer3D-TAP: Phase/Uncertainty-Aware Front-End Fusion for Cine CMR View Classification Pipelines

arXiv 2604.11389 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable recognition of standard cine cardiac MRI views is essential because each view determines which cardiac anatomy is visualized and which quantitative analyses can be performed. Incorrect view identification, whether by a human reader or an automated deep learning system, can propagate errors into segmentation, volumetric assessment, strain analysis, and valve evaluation. However, accurate view classification remains challenging under routine clinical variability in scanner vendor, acquisition protocol, motion artifacts, and plane prescription. We present ConvFormer3D-TAP, a cine-specific spatiotemporal architecture that integrates 3D convolutional tokenization with multiscale self-attention. The model is trained using masked spatiotemporal reconstruction and uncertainty-weighted multi-clip fusion to enhance robustness across cardiac phases and ambiguous temporal segments. The design captures complementary cues: local anatomical structure through convolutional priors and long-range cardiac-cycle dynamics through hierarchical attention. On a cohort of 150,974 clinically acquired cine sequences spanning six standard cine cardiac MRI views, ConvFormer3D-TAP achieved 96% validation accuracy with per-class F1-scores >= 0.94 and strong calibration (ECE = 0.025; Brier = 0.040). Error analysis shows that residual confusions are concentrated in anatomically adjacent long-axis and LVOT/AV view pairs, consistent with intrinsic prescription overlap. These results support ConvFormer3D-TAP as a scalable front-end for view routing, filtering and quality control in end-to-end cMRI workflows.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  3. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  7. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  8. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
  9. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  10. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  11. 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
  12. 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
11 more
  1. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
  2. 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
  3. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  4. 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 856
  5. 2017Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classificationcited by 521
  6. 2021MViTv2: Improved Multiscale Vision Transformers for Classification and Detectioncited by 519
  7. 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 484
  8. 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
  9. 2022UniFormer: Unified Transformer for Efficient Spatiotemporal Representation Learningcited by 184
  10. 2022UniFormerV2: Spatiotemporal Learning by Arming Image ViTs with Video UniFormercited by 116
  11. 2019Cardiac MRI Segmentation with Strong Anatomical Guaranteescited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.