mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

bioLeak: Leakage-Aware Modeling and Diagnostics for Machine Learning in R

arXiv 2604.10965 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026stat.CO cs.LG stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data leakage remains a recurrent source of optimistic bias in biomedical machine learning studies. Standard row-wise cross-validation and globally estimated preprocessing steps are often inappropriate for data with repeated measurements, study-level heterogeneity, batch effects, or temporal dependencies. This paper describes bioLeak, an R package for constructing leakage-aware resampling workflows and for auditing fitted models for common leakage mechanisms. The package provides leakage-aware split construction, train-fold-only preprocessing, cross-validated model fitting, nested hyperparameter tuning, post hoc leakage audits, and HTML reporting. The implementation supports binary classification, multiclass classification, regression, and survival analysis, with task-specific metrics and S4 containers for splits, fits, audits, and inflation summaries. The simulation artifacts show how apparent performance changes under controlled leakage mechanisms, and the case study illustrates how guarded and leaky pipelines can yield materially different conclusions on multi-study transcriptomic data. The emphasis throughout is on software design, reproducible workflows, and interpretation of diagnostic output.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

3 of 39 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?cited by 65
  2. 2019"The Human Body is a Black Box": Supporting Clinical Decision-Making with Deep Learningcited by 39
  3. 2019On the cross-validation bias due to unsupervised pre-processingcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.