INCRT: An Incremental Transformer That Determines Its Own Architecture
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer architectures are designed by trial and error: the number of attention heads, the depth, and the head size are fixed before training begins, with no mathematical principle to guide the choice. The result is systematic structural redundancy -- between half and four-fifths of all heads in a trained model can be removed without measurable loss -- because the architecture allocates capacity without reference to the actual requirements of the task.This paper introduces INCRT (Incremental Transformer), an architecture that determines its own structure during training. Starting from a single head, INCRT adds one attention head at a time whenever its current configuration is provably insufficient, and prunes heads that have become redundant. Each growth decision is driven by a single, online-computable geometric quantity derived from the task's directional structure, requiring no separate validation phase and no hand-tuned schedule. Two theorems form the theoretical backbone. The first (homeostatic convergence) establishes that the system always reaches a finite stopping configuration that is simultaneously minimal (no redundant heads) and sufficient (no uncaptured directional energy above the threshold). The second (compressed-sensing analogy) provides a geometric upper bound on the number of heads that this configuration can contain, as a function of the spectral complexity of the task. Experiments on SARS-CoV-2 variant classification and SST-2 sentiment analysis confirm both results: the predicted and observed head counts agree within 12% across all benchmarks, and the final architectures match or exceed BERT-base on distribution-specific tasks while using between three and seven times fewer parameters and no pre-training.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2026.
Builds on
9 of 23 references.
References · 9
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2018DARTS: Differentiable Architecture Searchcited by 1,798
- 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
- 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 837
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
- 2025The geometry of BERTcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Temporal Attention for Adaptive Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems with Unobservable Memorycited by 1
- 2026Incremental Transformer for Surrogate-Based Inverse Design of Geopolymer Mixturescited by 0
- 2026When is the combined load identifiable from a stress-intensity profile? A coupled forward-inverse study on SIFBench finite-element datacited by 0
- 2026Runtime-Incremental Transformer for Reinforcement-Learning-Based Adaptive Controlcited by 0
- 2026Runtime-Incremental Transformer for Reinforcement-Learning-Based Adaptive Control11 Sep 2026
- 2026When is the combined load identifiable from a stress-intensity profile? A coupled forward-inverse study on SIFBench finite-element data12 Jul 2026
- 2026Incremental Transformer for Surrogate-Based Inverse Design of Geopolymer Mixtures12 Jul 2026
- 2026Temporal Attention for Adaptive Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems with Unobservable Memory7 May 2026