mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

WOODELF-HD: Efficient Background SHAP for High-Depth Decision Trees

arXiv 2604.10569 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Decision-tree ensembles are a cornerstone of predictive modeling, and SHAP is a standard framework for interpreting their predictions. Among its variants, Background SHAP offers high accuracy by modeling missing features using a background dataset. Historically, this approach did not scale well, as the time complexity for explaining n instances using m background samples included an O(mn) component. Recent methods such as Woodelf and PLTreeSHAP reduce this to O(m+n), but introduce a preprocessing bottleneck that grows as 3^D with tree depth D, making them impractical for deep trees. We address this limitation with WoodelfHD, a Woodelf extension that reduces the 3^D factor to 2^D. The key idea is a Strassen-like multiplication scheme that exploits the structure of Woodelf matrices, reducing matrix-vector multiplication from O(k^2) to O(k*log(k)) via a fully vectorized, non-recursive implementation. In addition, we merge path nodes with identical features, reducing cache size and memory usage. When running on standard environments, WoodelfHD enables exact Background SHAP computation for trees with depths up to 21, where previous methods fail due to excessive memory usage. For ensembles of depths 12 and 15, it achieves speedups of 33x and 162x, respectively, over the state-of-the-art.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2026.

Builds on

9 of 36 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2018Tunability: Importance of Hyperparameters of Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 99
  4. 2020On the Tractability of SHAP Explanationscited by 92
  5. 2017CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical featurescited by 31
  6. 2021Fast TreeSHAP: Accelerating SHAP Value Computation for Treescited by 29
  7. 2019The Shapley Value of Tuples in Query Answeringcited by 23
  8. 2020GPUTreeShap: Massively Parallel Exact Calculation of SHAP Scores for Tree Ensemblescited by 14
  9. 2026TreeGrad-Ranker: Feature Ranking via O(L)-Time Gradients for Decision Treescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.