mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Integrating SAINT with Tree-Based Models: A Case Study in Employee Attrition Prediction

arXiv 2604.10337 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Employee attrition presents a major challenge for organizations, increasing costs and reducing productivity. Predicting attrition accurately enables proactive retention strategies, but existing machine learning models often struggle to capture complex feature interactions in tabular HR datasets. While tree-based models such as XGBoost and LightGBM perform well on structured data, traditional encoding techniques like one-hot encoding can introduce sparsity and fail to preserve semantic relationships between categorical features. This study explores a hybrid approach by integrating SAINT (Self-Attention and Intersample Attention Transformer)-generated embeddings with tree-based models to enhance employee attrition prediction. SAINT leverages self-attention mechanisms to model intricate feature interactions. In this study, we explore SAINT both as a standalone classifier and as a feature extractor for tree-based models. We evaluate the performance, generalizability, and interpretability of standalone models (SAINT, XGBoost, LightGBM) and hybrid models that combine SAINT embeddings with tree-based classifiers. Experimental results show that standalone tree-based models outperform both the standalone SAINT model and the hybrid approaches in predictive accuracy and generalization. Contrary to expectations, the hybrid models did not improve performance. One possible explanation is that tree-based models struggle to utilize dense, high-dimensional embeddings effectively. Additionally, the hybrid approach significantly reduced interpretability, making model decisions harder to explain. These findings suggest that transformer-based embeddings, while capturing feature relationships, do not necessarily enhance tree-based classifiers. Future research should explore alternative fusion strategies for integrating deep learning with structured data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2026.

Builds on

6 of 18 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 530
  3. 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 398
  4. 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 310
  5. 2016Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variablescited by 85
  6. 2023Constructing Tree-based Index for Efficient and Effective Dense Retrievalcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.