mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Degradation-Consistent Paired Training for Robust AI-Generated Image Detection

arXiv 2604.10102 ↗First posted 11 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI-generated image detectors suffer significant performance degradation under real-world image corruptions such as JPEG compression, Gaussian blur, and resolution downsampling. We observe that state-of-the-art methods, including B-Free, treat degradation robustness as a byproduct of data augmentation rather than an explicit training objective. In this work, we propose Degradation-Consistent Paired Training (DCPT), a simple yet effective training strategy that explicitly enforces robustness through paired consistency constraints. For each training image, we construct a clean view and a degraded view, then impose two constraints: a feature consistency loss that minimizes the cosine distance between clean and degraded representations, and a prediction consistency loss based on symmetric KL divergence that aligns output distributions across views. DCPT adds zero additional parameters and zero inference overhead. Experiments on the Synthbuster benchmark (9 generators, 8 degradation conditions) demonstrate that DCPT improves the degraded-condition average accuracy by 9.1 percentage points compared to an identical baseline without paired training, while sacrificing only 0.9% clean accuracy. The improvement is most pronounced under JPEG compression (+15.7% to +17.9%). Ablation further reveals that adding architectural components leads to overfitting on limited training data, confirming that training objective improvement is more effective than architectural augmentation for degradation robustness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 29 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  5. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  6. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  7. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  8. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  9. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  10. 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,290
  11. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
  12. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
11 more
  1. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  2. 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
  3. 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
  4. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 469
  5. 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
  6. 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 282
  7. 2023Raising the Bar of AI-generated Image Detection with CLIPcited by 163
  8. 2021Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-artcited by 139
  9. 2024C2P-CLIP: Injecting Category Common Prompt in CLIP to Enhance Generalization in Deepfake Detectioncited by 111
  10. 2024A Bias-Free Training Paradigm for More General AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 67
  11. 2022Detecting GAN-generated Images by Orthogonal Training of Multiple CNNscited by 46

Built on by

Not cited yet.