mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Training Deep Visual Networks Beyond Loss and Accuracy Through a Dynamical Systems Approach

arXiv 2604.09716 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep visual recognition models are usually trained and evaluated using metrics such as loss and accuracy. While these measures show whether a model is improving, they reveal very little about how its internal representations change during training. This paper introduces a complementary way to study that process by examining training through the lens of dynamical systems. Drawing on ideas from signal analysis originally used to study biological neural activity, we define three measures from layer activations collected across training epochs: an integration score that reflects long-range coordination across layers, a metastability score that captures how flexibly the network shifts between more and less synchronised states, and a combined dynamical stability index. We apply this framework to nine combinations of model architecture and dataset, including several ResNet variants, DenseNet-121, MobileNetV2, VGG-16, and a pretrained Vision Transformer on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. The results suggest three main patterns. First, the integration measure consistently distinguishes the easier CIFAR-10 setting from the more difficult CIFAR-100 setting. Second, changes in the volatility of the stability index may provide an early sign of convergence before accuracy fully plateaus. Third, the relationship between integration and metastability appears to reflect different styles of training behaviour. Overall, this study offers an exploratory but promising new way to understand deep visual training beyond loss and accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

23 of 40 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  8. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  9. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  10. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  11. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  12. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
11 more
  1. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
  2. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  3. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  4. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 629
  5. 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
  6. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
  7. 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 227
  8. 2021Neural Collapse Under MSE Loss: Proximity to and Dynamics on the Central Pathcited by 158
  9. 2021Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descentcited by 24
  10. 2025Quantifying the Dynamics of Consciousness using Hierarchical Integration, Organised Complexity and Metastabilitycited by 3
  11. 2023Dynamical properties and mechanisms of metastability: a perspective in neurosciencecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.