AMO-ENE: Attention-based Multi-Omics Fusion Model for Outcome Prediction in Extra Nodal Extension and HPV-associated Oropharyngeal Cancer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Extranodal extension (ENE) is an emerging prognostic factor in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), although it is currently omitted as a clinical staging criteria. Recent works have advocated for the inclusion of iENE as a prognostic marker in HPV-positive OPC staging. However, several practical limitations continue to hinder its clinical integration, including inconsistencies in segmentation, low contrast in the periphery of metastatic lymph nodes on CT imaging, and laborious manual annotations. To address these limitations, we propose a fully automated end-to-end pipeline that uses computed tomography (CT) images with clinical data to assess the status of nodal ENE and predict treatment outcomes. Our approach includes a hierarchical 3D semi-supervised segmentation model designed to detect and delineate relevant iENE from radiotherapy planning CT scans. From these segmentations, a set of radiomics and deep features are extracted to train an imaging-detected ENE grading classifier. The predicted ENE status is then evaluated for its prognostic value and compared with existing staging criteria. Furthermore, we integrate these nodal features with primary tumor characteristics in a multimodal, attention-based outcome prediction model, providing a dynamic framework for outcome prediction. Our method is validated in an internal cohort of 397 HPV-positive OPC patients treated with radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy between 2009 and 2020. For outcome prediction at the 2-year mark, our pipeline surpassed baseline models with 88.2% (4.8) in AUC for metastatic recurrence, 79.2% (7.4) for overall survival, and 78.1% (8.6) for disease-free survival. We also obtain a concordance index of 83.3% (6.5) for metastatic recurrence, 71.3% (8.9) for overall survival, and 70.0% (8.1) for disease-free survival, making it feasible for clinical decision making.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.
Builds on
13 of 41 references.
References · 13
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 823
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 235
- 2023MA-SAM: Modality-agnostic SAM Adaptation for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 82
- 2017Radiomics strategies for risk assessment of tumour failure in head-and-neck cancercited by 31
- 2022Automated head and neck tumor segmentation from 3D PET/CTcited by 9
- 2024Sparse Bayesian Networks: Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Analysiscited by 8
- 2022Radiomics-enhanced Deep Multi-task Learning for Outcome Prediction in Head and Neck Cancercited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.