GRM: Utility-Aware Jailbreak Attacks on Audio LLMs via Gradient-Ratio Masking
On the map: LLM safety and security → Audio jailbreaks and speech backdoors
Abstract (arXiv)
Audio Large Language Models (ALLMs) enable spoken interaction but introduce new jailbreak vulnerabilities. Existing perturbation-based jailbreaks do not explicitly control which frequency bands carry the perturbation. Although such perturbations can elicit unsafe responses, repeatedly applying a universal perturbation across diverse inputs may also degrade utility on normal tasks, leaving a conspicuous behavioral footprint that may expose the attack to users or automated monitoring systems and thereby compromise its stealthiness. To determine whether full-band perturbation is necessary, we vary coverage from partial-band to full-band. Jailbreak Success Rate (JSR) varies non-monotonically, while utility degradation grows with coverage. This mismatch shows that selected bands can yield stronger attacks with less utility degradation than full-band perturbations. Based on this observation, we propose GRM, a utility-aware, frequency-selective jailbreak framework that ranks Mel bands by the ratio between jailbreak contribution and transcript sensitivity, confines a universal perturbation to selected bands, and regularizes deviations from the intended request semantics. Experiments on four ALLMs show that GRM achieves an average JSR of 88.46% while substantially reducing utility degradation across benign transcription and response tasks relative to baselines. Our code is available at hrefhttps://github.com/159753Fetter/GRMthis repository. Warning: This paper contains potentially sensitive content.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Audio jailbreaks and speech backdoors, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.
Builds on
17 of 45 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Jailbreak-AudioBench: In-Depth Evaluation and Analysis of Jailbreak Threats for Large Audio Language Models23 Jan
- 2024AdvWave: Stealthy Adversarial Jailbreak Attack against Large Audio-Language Models11 Dec
- 2024Audio Is the Achilles' Heel: Red Teaming Audio Large Multimodal Models31 Oct
Other references · 14
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,301
- 2023SpeechGPT: Empowering Large Language Models with Intrinsic Cross-Modal Conversational Abilitiescited by 518
- 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
- 2023AudioPaLM: A Large Language Model That Can Speak and Listencited by 333
- 2024Robust Prompt Optimization for Defending Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 150
- 2024GradSafe: Detecting Jailbreak Prompts for LLMs via Safety-Critical Gradient Analysiscited by 87
- 2025LLaMA-Omni2: LLM-based Real-time Spoken Chatbot with Autoregressive Streaming Speech Synthesiscited by 75
- 2024Distilling an End-to-End Voice Assistant Without Instruction Training Datacited by 35
- 2024Jigsaw Puzzles: Splitting Harmful Questions to Jailbreak Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Towards Effective Federated Graph Foundation Model via Mitigating Knowledge Entanglementcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.