Delve into the Applicability of Advanced Optimizers for Multi-Task Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-Task Learning (MTL) is a foundational machine learning problem that has seen extensive development over the past decade. Recently, various optimization-based MTL approaches have been proposed to learn multiple tasks simultaneously by altering the optimization trajectory. Although these methods strive to de-conflict and re-balance tasks, we empirically identify that their effectiveness is often undermined by an overlooked factor when employing advanced optimizers: the instant-derived gradients play only a marginal role in the actual parameter updates. This discrepancy prevents MTL frameworks from fully releasing its power on learning dynamics. Furthermore, we observe that Muon-a recently emerged advanced optimizer-inherently functions as a multi-task learner, which underscores the critical importance of the gradients used for its orthogonalization. To address these issues, we propose APT (Applicability of advanced oPTimizers), a framework featuring a simple adaptive momentum mechanism designed to balance the strengths between advanced optimizers and MTL. Additionally, we introduce a light direction preservation method to facilitate Muon's orthogonalization. Extensive experiments across four mainstream MTL datasets demonstrate that APT consistently augments existing MTL approaches, yielding substantial performance improvements.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
References · 27
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
- 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,345
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,210
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 809
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
- 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 533
- 2021Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learningcited by 441
- 2021Efficiently Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learningcited by 218
15 more
- 2022Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Gamecited by 209
- 2020Just Pick a Sign: Optimizing Deep Multitask Models with Gradient Sign Dropoutcited by 199
- 2019Adaptive Gradient Methods with Dynamic Bound of Learning Ratecited by 181
- 2019Attentive Single-Tasking of Multiple Taskscited by 148
- 2021Reasonable Effectiveness of Random Weighting: A Litmus Test for Multi-Task Learningcited by 100
- 2023FAMO: Fast Adaptive Multitask Optimizationcited by 74
- 2023Independent Component Alignment for Multi-Task Learningcited by 69
- 2024Fair Resource Allocation in Multi-Task Learningcited by 34
- 2024Jacobian Descent for Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 18
- 2021MultiTask-CenterNet (MCN): Efficient and Diverse Multitask Learning using an Anchor Free Approachcited by 17
- 2024Layer by Layer: Uncovering Where Multi-Task Learning Happens in Instruction-Tuned Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2024GO4Align: Group Optimization for Multi-Task Alignmentcited by 11
- 2025LDC-MTL: Balancing Multi-Task Learning through Scalable Loss Discrepancy Controlcited by 7
- 2025Continual Optimization with Symmetry Teleportation for Multi-Task Learningcited by 3
- 2025Injecting Imbalance Sensitivity for Multi-Task Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.