Adaptive Candidate Point Thompson Sampling for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Bayesian optimization, Thompson sampling selects the evaluation point by sampling from the posterior distribution over the objective function maximizer. Because this sampling problem is intractable for Gaussian process (GP) surrogates, the posterior distribution is typically restricted to fixed discretizations (i.e., candidate points) that become exponentially sparse as dimensionality increases. While previous works aim to increase candidate point density through scalable GP approximations, our orthogonal approach increases density by adaptively reducing the search space during sampling. Specifically, we introduce Adaptive Candidate Thompson Sampling (ACTS), which generates candidate points in subspaces guided by the gradient of a surrogate model sample. ACTS is a simple drop-in replacement for existing TS methods -- including those that use trust regions or other local approximations -- producing better samples of maxima and improved optimization across synthetic and real-world benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.
Builds on
28 of 59 references.
References · 28
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 609
- 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 374
- 2018GuacaMol: Benchmarking Models for De Novo Molecular Designcited by 297
- 2014An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Thompson Samplingcited by 178
- 2014Learning to Optimize via Information-Directed Samplingcited by 168
- 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 149
- 2021High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Sparse Axis-Aligned Subspacescited by 141
- 2016Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Roboticscited by 134
- 2020Efficiently Sampling Functions from Gaussian Process Posteriorscited by 127
- 2017Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional Spacescited by 117
- 2024Vanilla Bayesian Optimization Performs Great in High Dimensionscited by 92
- 2014Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimizationcited by 90
16 more
- 2021Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization over High-Dimensional Search Spacescited by 87
- 2020Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 84
- 2022Local Latent Space Bayesian Optimization over Structured Inputscited by 79
- 2020Pathwise Conditioning of Gaussian Processescited by 64
- 2017Bayesian Optimization with Gradientscited by 59
- 2023Increasing the Scope as You Learn: Adaptive Bayesian Optimization in Nested Subspacescited by 52
- 2018Constant-Time Predictive Distributions for Gaussian Processescited by 48
- 2021LassoBench: A High-Dimensional Hyperparameter Optimization Benchmark Suite for Lassocited by 41
- 2021Local policy search with Bayesian optimizationcited by 38
- 2022Local Bayesian optimization via maximizing probability of descentcited by 30
- 2020Fast Matrix Square Roots with Applications to Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Optimizationcited by 26
- 2023The Behavior and Convergence of Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 20
- 2023qPOTS: Efficient batch multiobjective Bayesian optimization via Pareto optimal Thompson samplingcited by 11
- 2024Improving sample efficiency of high dimensional Bayesian optimization with MCMCcited by 9
- 2025Exploring Exploration in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 9
- 2016A sequential Monte Carlo approach to Thompson sampling for Bayesian optimizationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.