Drift and selection in LLM text ecosystems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The public text record -- the material from which both people and AI systems now learn -- is increasingly shaped by its own outputs. Generated text enters the public record, later agents learn from it, and the cycle repeats. Here we develop an exactly solvable mathematical framework for this recursive process, based on variable-order n-gram agents, and separate two forces acting on the public corpus. The first is drift: unfiltered reuse progressively removes rare forms, and in the infinite-corpus limit we characterise the stable distributions exactly. The second is selection: publication, ranking and verification filter what enters the record, and the outcome depends on what is selected. When publication merely reflects the statistical status quo, the corpus converges to a shallow state in which further lookahead brings no benefit. When publication is normative -- rewarding quality, correctness or novelty -- deeper structure persists, and we establish an optimal upper bound on the resulting divergence from shallow equilibria. The framework therefore identifies when recursive publication compresses public text and when selective filtering sustains richer structure, with implications for the design of AI training corpora.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
References · 18
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
- 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 239
- 2024A Survey on Data Selection for Language Modelscited by 230
- 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 143
- 2023On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Datacited by 98
6 more
- 2023The Curious Decline of Linguistic Diversity: Training Language Models on Synthetic Textcited by 97
- 2022Will Large-scale Generative Models Corrupt Future Datasets?cited by 59
- 2024Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verificationcited by 43
- 2021Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twittercited by 38
- 2024Self-Correcting Self-Consuming Loops for Generative Model Trainingcited by 34
- 2023Nepotistically Trained Generative-AI Models Collapsecited by 27
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.