mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sinkhorn doubly stochastic attention rank decay analysis

arXiv 2604.07925 ↗First posted 9 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI math.OCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The self-attention mechanism is central to the success of Transformer architectures. However, standard row-stochastic attention has been shown to suffer from significant signal degradation across layers. In particular, it can induce rank collapse, resulting in increasingly uniform token representations, as well as entropy collapse, characterized by highly concentrated attention distributions. Recent work has highlighted the benefits of doubly stochastic attention as a form of entropy regularization, promoting a more balanced attention distribution and leading to improved empirical performance. In this paper, we study rank collapse across network depth and show that doubly stochastic attention matrices normalized with Sinkhorn algorithm preserve rank more effectively than standard softmax row-stochastic ones. As previously shown for softmax, skip connections are crucial to mitigate rank collapse. We empirically validate this phenomenon on both sentiment analysis and image classification tasks. Moreover, we derive a theoretical bound for the pure self-attention rank decay when using Sinkhorn normalization and find that rank decays to one doubly exponentially with depth, a phenomenon that has already been shown for softmax.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.

Builds on

27 of 42 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  4. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  5. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  6. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  7. 2020Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexitycited by 1,474
  8. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
  9. 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
  10. 2019Generalized Sliced Wasserstein Distancescited by 208
  11. 2022DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layerscited by 178
  12. 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 174
15 more
  1. 2023Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy Collapsecited by 161
  2. 2022Signal Propagation in Transformers: Theoretical Perspectives and the Role of Rank Collapsecited by 141
  3. 2015Sliced Wasserstein Kernels for Probability Distributionscited by 65
  4. 2023LipsFormer: Introducing Lipschitz Continuity to Vision Transformerscited by 34
  5. 2020Temperature check: theory and practice for training models with softmax-cross-entropy lossescited by 31
  6. 2025Softmax is 1/2-Lipschitz: A tight bound across all ℓp normscited by 22
  7. 2024Expected Sliced Transport Planscited by 19
  8. 2025Two failure modes of deep transformers and how to avoid them: a unified theory of signal propagation at initialisationcited by 17
  9. 2022Rethinking Initialization of the Sinkhorn Algorithmcited by 14
  10. 2025ESPFormer: Doubly-Stochastic Attention with Expected Sliced Transport Planscited by 10
  11. 2025Exploring the Impact of Temperature Scaling in Softmax for Classification and Adversarial Robustnesscited by 9
  12. 2018Lipschitz Networks and Distributional Robustnesscited by 6
  13. 2025Quantum Doubly Stochastic Transformerscited by 6
  14. 2025LOTFormer: Doubly-Stochastic Linear Attention via Low-Rank Optimal Transportcited by 4
  15. 2024Quantum Theory and Application of Contextual Optimal Transportcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.