Needle in a Haystack: One-Class Representation Learning for Detecting Rare Malignant Cells in Computational Cytology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In computational cytology, detecting malignancy on whole-slide images is difficult because malignant cells are morphologically diverse yet vanishingly rare amid a vast background of normal cells. Accurate detection of these extremely rare malignant cells remains challenging due to large class imbalance and limited annotations. Conventional weakly supervised approaches, such as multiple instance learning (MIL), often fail to generalize at the instance level, especially when the fraction of malignant cells (witness rate) is exceedingly low. In this study, we explore the use of one-class representation learning techniques for detecting malignant cells in low-witness-rate scenarios. These methods are trained exclusively on slide-negative patches, without requiring any instance-level supervision. Specifically, we evaluate two OCC approaches, DSVDD and DROC, and compare them with FS-SIL, WS-SIL, and the recent ItS2CLR method. The one-class methods learn compact representations of normality and detect deviations at test time. Experiments on a publicly available bone marrow cytomorphology dataset (TCIA) and an in-house oral cancer cytology dataset show that DSVDD achieves state-of-the-art performance in instance-level abnormality ranking, particularly in ultra-low witness-rate regimes (≤ 1%) and, in some cases, even outperforming fully supervised learning, which is typically not a practical option in whole-slide cytology due to the infeasibility of exhaustive instance-level annotations. DROC is also competitive under extreme rarity, benefiting from distribution-augmented contrastive learning. These findings highlight one-class representation learning as a robust and interpretable superior choice to MIL for malignant cell detection under extreme rarity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Apr 2026.
Builds on
16 of 38 references.
References · 16
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
- 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 745
- 2020Dual-stream Multiple Instance Learning Network for Whole Slide Image Classification with Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 478
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 425
- 2020Deep Learning for Medical Anomaly Detection -- A Surveycited by 127
- 2020Better Aggregation in Test-Time Augmentationcited by 122
- 2021Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging -- A Mini Reviewcited by 44
- 2021One-Class Classification: A Surveycited by 35
4 more
- 2024Understanding Test-Time Augmentationcited by 23
- 2022Multiple Instance Learning via Iterative Self-Paced Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 22
- 2019A Deep Learning based Pipeline for Efficient Oral Cancer Screening on Whole Slide Imagescited by 5
- 2024DeepSet SimCLR: Self-supervised deep sets for improved pathology representation learningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.