mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Program Analysis Guided LLM Agent for Proof-of-Concept Generation

arXiv 2604.07624 ↗First posted 8 Apr 2026cs.SEcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Software developers frequently receive vulnerability reports that require them to reproduce the vulnerability in a reliable manner by generating a proof-of-concept (PoC) input that triggers it. Given the source code for a software project and a specific code location for a potential vulnerability, automatically generating a PoC for the given vulnerability has been a challenging research problem. Symbolic execution and fuzzing techniques require expert guidance and manual steps and face scalability challenges for PoC generation. Although recent advances in LLMs have increased the level of automation and scalability, the success rate of PoC generation with LLMs remains quite low. In this paper, we present a novel approach called Program Analysis Guided proof of concept generation agENT (PAGENT) that is scalable and significantly improves the success rate of automated PoC generation compared to prior results. PAGENT integrates lightweight and rule-based static analysis phases for providing static analysis guidance and sanitizer-based profiling and coverage information for providing dynamic analysis guidance with a PoC generation agent. Our experiments demonstrate that the resulting hybrid approach significantly outperforms the prior top-performing agentic approach by 132% for the PoC generation task.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 22 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.

Builds on

22 of 54 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025FaultLine: Automated Proof-of-Vulnerability Generation Using LLM Agents21 Jul

Other references · 21

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
  3. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  4. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 1,002
  5. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 815
  6. 2024Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agentscited by 564
  7. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repaircited by 232
  8. 2023Fuzz4All: Universal Fuzzing with Large Language Modelscited by 88
  9. 2024Code-Aware Prompting: A study of Coverage Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLMcited by 64
  10. 2025LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directionscited by 50
  11. 2023Prompting Is All You Need: Automated Android Bug Replay with Large Language Modelscited by 40
  12. 2016A Survey of Symbolic Execution Techniquescited by 36
9 more
  1. 2025Otter: Generating Tests from Issues to Validate SWE Patchescited by 25
  2. 2025MIRAGE-Bench: LLM Agent is Hallucinating and Where to Find Themcited by 16
  3. 2024CodeACT: Code Adaptive Compute-efficient Tuning Framework for Code LLMscited by 15
  4. 2023Evaluating Diverse Large Language Models for Automatic and General Bug Reproductioncited by 12
  5. 2025PoCGen: Generating Proof-of-Concept Exploits for Vulnerabilities in Npm Packagescited by 12
  6. 2024LLM Agents Improve Semantic Code Searchcited by 7
  7. 2019Targeted Greybox Fuzzing with Static Lookahead Analysiscited by 2
  8. 2025A Comparative Study of Fuzzers and Static Analysis Tools for Finding Memory Unsafety in C and C++cited by 2
  9. 2025Enhancing Semantic Understanding in Pointer Analysis using Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Execution-State-Aware LLM Reasoning for Automated Proof-of-Vulnerability Generation
  2. 2026AnyPoC: Universal Proof-of-Concept Test Generation for Scalable LLM-Based Bug Detection
  3. 2024AutoSafeCoder: A Multi-Agent Framework for Securing LLM Code Generation through Static Analysis and Fuzz Testing
  4. 2026A Dual-Loop Agent Framework for Automated Vulnerability Reproduction
  5. 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks
  6. 2025PoCo: Agentic Proof-of-Concept Exploit Generation for Smart Contracts
  7. 2026A Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Exploit Generation with Constraint-Guided Comprehension and Reflection
  8. 2025A Systematic Study on Generating Web Vulnerability Proof-of-Concepts Using Large Language Models