MirageBackdoor: A Stealthy Attack that Induces Think-Well-Answer-Wrong Reasoning
On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks
Abstract (arXiv)
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has become a standard paradigm for eliciting complex reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models, it inadvertently exposes a new attack surface for backdoor attacks. Existing CoT backdoor attacks typically manipulate the intermediate reasoning steps to steer the model toward incorrect answers. However, these corrupted reasoning traces are readily detected by prevalent process-monitoring defenses. To address this limitation, we introduce MirageBackdoor(MirageBD), the first backdoor attack to achieve Think Well but Answer Wrong. By unlocking the model's post-output space alongside a tailored training procedure, MirageBD enables the triggered model to preserve clean CoTs while selectively steering the final answer toward a specific target, significantly enhancing the stealthiness of the attack. Experiments show that MirageBD generally achieves over 90% attack success rate across four datasets and five models with a poison ratio of only 5%. Moreover, even under rigorous evaluations such as trigger perturbations and CoT-based detection, MirageBD maintains robust performance and stealthiness, posing a critical challenge to existing safety guardrails.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 29 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2026.
Builds on
29 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Rethinking Reasoning: A Survey on Reasoning-based Backdoors in LLMs9 Oct
- 2025Reasoning Introduces New Poisoning Attacks Yet Makes Them More Complicated6 Sep
- 2025BadReasoner: Planting Tunable Overthinking Backdoors into Large Reasoning Models for Fun or Profit24 Jul
- 2025GUARD:Dual-Agent based Backdoor Defense on Chain-of-Thought in Neural Code Generation27 May
- 2025ShadowCoT: Cognitive Hijacking for Stealthy Reasoning Backdoors in LLMs8 Apr
- 2025BadJudge: Backdoor Vulnerabilities of LLM-as-a-Judge1 Mar
- 2025DarkMind: Latent Chain-of-Thought Backdoor in Customized LLMs24 Jan
- 2024When Backdoors Speak: Understanding LLM Backdoor Attacks Through Model-Generated Explanations19 Nov
- 2024BadEdit: Backdooring large language models by model editing20 Mar
- 2024Universal Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models: Backdoor Attacks for In-context Learning11 Jan
- 2023Setting the Trap: Capturing and Defeating Backdoors in Pretrained Language Models through Honeypots28 Oct
- 2023Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection31 Jul
Other references · 17
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 662
- 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 650
- 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 384
- 2020Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pre-trained Modelscited by 341
- 2023Poisoning Language Models During Instruction Tuningcited by 269
- 2020ONION: A Simple and Effective Defense Against Textual Backdoor Attackscited by 263
- 2020BadNL: Backdoor Attacks against NLP Models with Semantic-preserving Improvementscited by 211
- 2021Backdoor Attacks on Pre-trained Models by Layerwise Weight Poisoningcited by 113
- 2022Prompt Consistency for Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 67
5 more
- 2025Mitigating Deceptive Alignment via Self-Monitoringcited by 29
- 2024Large Language Models for Anomaly and Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 27
- 2025BadMoE: Backdooring Mixture-of-Experts LLMs via Optimizing Routing Triggers and Infecting Dormant Expertscited by 14
- 2025Thought Purity: A Defense Framework For Chain-of-Thought Attackcited by 4
- 2025Post-Completion Learning for Language Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Why Are LLM Backdoor Defenses Fragmented? A Feature-Level Explanation with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 0
- 2026OPBackdoor: Opportunistic Backdoors via Alibi-Aligned Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controllercited by 0
- 2026Detecting Chain-of-Thought Hijacking in Backdoored Multimodal Large Reasoning Modelscited by 0
- 2026Detecting Chain-of-Thought Hijacking in Backdoored Multimodal Large Reasoning Models12 Oct 2026
- 2026Cancerous Backdoor Attack: Gradual Activation via Invisible Tokens and A Stage Controller8 Oct 2026
- 2026OPBackdoor: Opportunistic Backdoors via Alibi-Aligned Reasoning21 Sep 2026
- 2026Why Are LLM Backdoor Defenses Fragmented? A Feature-Level Explanation with Sparse Autoencoders31 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Critical-CoT: A Robust Defense Framework against Reasoning-Level Backdoor Attacks in Large Language Models
- 2026Evading Chain-of-Thought Monitoring Through Model Poisoning
- 2025BadThink: Triggered Overthinking Attacks on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025Chain-of-Thought Hijacking
- 2026Thought-Transfer: Indirect Targeted Poisoning Attacks on Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Models
- 2025H-CoT: Hijacking the Chain-of-Thought Safety Reasoning Mechanism to Jailbreak Large Reasoning Models, Including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
- 2026Thinking Wrong in Silence: Backdoor Attacks on Continuous Latent Reasoning
- 2024BadChain: Backdoor Chain-of-Thought Prompting for Large Language Models