ART: Attention Replacement Technique to Improve Factuality in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hallucination in large language models (LLMs) continues to be a significant issue, particularly in tasks like question answering, where models often generate plausible yet incorrect or irrelevant information. Although various methods have been proposed to mitigate hallucinations, the relationship between attention patterns and hallucinations has not been fully explored. In this paper, we analyze the distribution of attention scores across each layer and attention head of LLMs, revealing a common and intriguing phenomenon: shallow layers of LLMs primarily rely on uniform attention patterns, where the model distributes its attention evenly across the entire sequence. This uniform attention pattern can lead to hallucinations, as the model fails to focus on the most relevant information. To mitigate this issue, we propose a training-free method called Attention Replacement Technique (ART), which replaces these uniform attention patterns in the shallow layers with local attention patterns. This change directs the model to focus more on the relevant contexts, thus reducing hallucinations. Through extensive experiments, ART demonstrates significant reductions in hallucinations across multiple LLM architectures, proving its effectiveness and generalizability without requiring fine-tuning or additional training data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
- 2023OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocationcited by 478
- 2024DuoAttention: Efficient Long-Context LLM Inference with Retrieval and Streaming Headscited by 288
- 2024Retrieval Head Mechanistically Explains Long-Context Factualitycited by 232
- 2024Not All Layers of LLMs Are Necessary During Inferencecited by 96
- 2024Unveiling and Harnessing Hidden Attention Sinks: Enhancing Large Language Models without Training through Attention Calibrationcited by 74
13 more
- 2024LoFiT: Localized Fine-tuning on LLM Representationscited by 57
- 2024Seeing Clearly by Layer Two: Enhancing Attention Heads to Alleviate Hallucination in LVLMscited by 52
- 2024Mitigating Modality Prior-Induced Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models via Deciphering Attention Causalitycited by 42
- 2024From Redundancy to Relevance: Information Flow in LVLMs Across Reasoning Taskscited by 38
- 2024DOPRA: Decoding Over-accumulation Penalization and Re-allocation in Specific Weighting Layercited by 27
- 2024Instance-adaptive Zero-shot Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 26
- 2025CoT-UQ: Improving Response-wise Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs with Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 23
- 2025Meaningless Tokens, Meaningful Gains: How Activation Shifts Enhance LLM Reasoningcited by 8
- 2025Dive into the Agent Matrix: A Realistic Evaluation of Self-Replication Risk in LLM Agentscited by 7
- 2024Llama SLayer 8B: Shallow Layers Hold the Key to Knowledge Injectioncited by 6
- 2026Context Tokens are Anchors: Understanding the Repetition Curse in dMLLMs from an Information Flow Perspectivecited by 6
- 2026Improving Visual Reasoning with Iterative Evidence Refinementcited by 5
- 2026Reinforcing Consistency in Video MLLMs with Structured Rewardscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.