mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HYVE: Hybrid Views for LLM Context Engineering over Machine Data

arXiv 2604.05400 ↗First posted 7 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine data is central to observability and diagnosis in modern computing systems, appearing in logs, metrics, telemetry traces, and configuration snapshots. When provided to large language models (LLMs), this data typically arrives as a mixture of natural language and structured payloads such as JSON or Python/AST literals. Yet LLMs remain brittle on such inputs, particularly when they are long, deeply nested, and dominated by repetitive structure. We present HYVE (HYbrid ViEw), a framework for LLM context engineering for inputs containing large machine-data payloads, inspired by database management principles. HYVE surrounds model invocation with coordinated preprocessing and postprocessing, centered on a request-scoped datastore augmented with schema information. During preprocessing, HYVE detects repetitive structure in raw inputs, materializes it in the datastore, transforms it into hybrid columnar and row-oriented views, and selectively exposes only the most relevant representation to the LLM. During postprocessing, HYVE either returns the model output directly, queries the datastore to recover omitted information, or performs a bounded additional LLM call for SQL-augmented semantic synthesis. We evaluate HYVE on diverse real-world workloads spanning knowledge QA, chart generation, anomaly detection, and multi-step network troubleshooting. Across these benchmarks, HYVE reduces token usage by 50-90% while maintaining or improving output quality. On structured generation tasks, it improves chart-generation accuracy by up to 132% and reduces latency by up to 83%. Overall, HYVE offers a practical approximation to an effectively unbounded context window for prompts dominated by large machine-data payloads.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Apr 2026.

Builds on

15 of 43 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
  2. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  3. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  4. 2023LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compressioncited by 453
  5. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  6. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 411
  7. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
  8. 2023Grammar-Constrained Decoding for Structured NLP Tasks without Finetuningcited by 197
  9. 2023Augmenting Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 189
  10. 2023Compressing Context to Enhance Inference Efficiency of Large Language Modelscited by 189
  11. 2023Large Language Models are Versatile Decomposers: Decompose Evidence and Questions for Table-based Reasoningcited by 178
  12. 2022Synchromesh: Reliable code generation from pre-trained language modelscited by 156
3 more
  1. 2023Table Meets LLM: Can Large Language Models Understand Structured Table Data? A Benchmark and Empirical Studycited by 116
  2. 2022Prompting Is Programming: A Query Language for Large Language Modelscited by 110
  3. 2024HTAP Databases: A Surveycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.