Exemplar Retrieval Without Overhypothesis Induction: Limits of Distributional Sequence Learning in Early Word Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Children do not simply learn that balls are round and blocks are square. They learn that shape is the kind of feature that tends to define object categories -- a second-order generalisation known as an overhypothesis [1, 2]. What kind of learning mechanism is sufficient for this inductive leap? Methods: We trained autoregressive transformer language models (3.4M-25.6M parameters) on synthetic corpora in which shape is the stable feature dimension across categories, with eight conditions controlling for alternative explanations. Results: Across 120 pre-registered runs evaluated on a 1,040-item wug test battery, every model achieved perfect first-order exemplar retrieval (100%) while second-order generalisation to novel nouns remained at chance (50-52%), a result confirmed by equivalence testing. A feature-swap diagnostic revealed that models rely on frame-to-feature template matching rather than structured noun-to-domain-to-feature abstraction. Conclusions: These results reveal a clear limitation of autoregressive distributional sequence learning under developmental-scale training conditions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
3 of 7 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.