From Video to Control: A Survey of Learning Manipulation Interfaces from Temporal Visual Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Video is a scalable observation of physical dynamics: it captures how objects move, how contact unfolds, and how scenes evolve under interaction -- all without requiring robot action labels. Yet translating this temporal structure into reliable robotic control remains an open challenge, because video lacks action supervision and differs from robot experience in embodiment, viewpoint, and physical constraints. This survey reviews methods that exploit non-action-annotated temporal video to learn control interfaces for robotic manipulation. We introduce an interface-centric taxonomy organized by where the video-to-control interface is constructed and what control properties it enables, identifying three families: direct video-action policies, which keep the interface implicit; latent-action methods, which route temporal structure through a compact learned intermediate; and explicit visual interfaces, which predict interpretable targets for downstream control. For each family, we analyze control-integration properties -- how the loop is closed, what can be verified before execution, and where failures enter. A cross-family synthesis reveals that the most pressing open challenges center on the robotics integration layer -- the mechanisms that connect video-derived predictions to dependable robot behavior -- and we outline research directions toward closing this gap.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Robot Learning from Human Videos: A Surveycited by 5
- 2026From World Models to World Action Models: A Concise Tutorial for Roboticscited by 4
- 2026GuidedAttention: Interpretable and Correctable Visual Attention for OOD-Robust Robot Manipulation via Imitation Learningcited by 1
- 2026The Embodiment Gap in Robot Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2026Algebraic Consistency Alone Does Not Certify Temporal Structure in Latent Action Modelscited by 0
- 2026Algebraic Consistency Alone Does Not Certify Temporal Structure in Latent Action Models20 Sep 2026
- 2026The Embodiment Gap in Robot Foundation Models19 Aug 2026
- 2026GuidedAttention: Interpretable and Correctable Visual Attention for OOD-Robust Robot Manipulation via Imitation Learning23 Jul 2026
- 2026From World Models to World Action Models: A Concise Tutorial for Robotics1 Jul 2026
- 2026Robot Learning from Human Videos: A Survey30 Apr 2026