mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Belief Dynamics for Detecting Behavioral Shifts in Safe Collaborative Manipulation

arXiv 2604.04967 ↗First posted 4 Apr 2026cs.RO cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robots operating in shared workspaces must maintain safe coordination with other agents whose behavior may change during task execution. When a collaborating agent switches strategy mid-episode, continuing under outdated assumptions can lead to unsafe actions and increased collision risk. Reliable detection of such behavioral regime changes is therefore critical. We study regime-switch detection under controlled non-stationarity in ManiSkill shared-workspace manipulation tasks. Across ten detection methods and five random seeds, enabling detection reduces post-switch collisions by 52%. However, average performance hides significant reliability differences: under a realistic tolerance of +-3 steps, detection ranges from 86% to 30%, while under +-5 steps all methods achieve 100%. We introduce UA-TOM, a lightweight belief-tracking module that augments frozen vision-language-action (VLA) control backbones using selective state-space dynamics, causal attention, and prediction-error signals. Across five seeds and 1200 episodes, UA-TOM achieves the highest detection rate among unassisted methods (85.7% at +-3) and the lowest close-range time (4.8 steps), outperforming an Oracle (5.3 steps). Analysis shows hidden-state update magnitude increases by 17x at regime switches and decays over roughly 10 timesteps, while the discretization step converges to a near-constant value (Delta_t approx 0.78), indicating sensitivity driven by learned dynamics rather than input-dependent gating. Cross-domain experiments in Overcooked show complementary roles of causal attention and prediction-error signals. UA-TOM introduces 7.4 ms inference overhead (14.8% of a 50 ms control budget), enabling reliable regime-switch detection without modifying the base policy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2026.

Builds on

13 of 20 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  3. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
  4. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,887
  5. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
  6. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,484
  7. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
  8. 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 349
  9. 2018Machine Theory of Mindcited by 226
  10. 2021Collaborating with Humans without Human Datacited by 142
  11. 2016Opponent Modeling in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 97
  12. 2019Dealing with Non-Stationarity in Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
1 more
  1. 2020Agent Modelling under Partial Observability for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 57

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026WatchAct: A Benchmark for Behavior-Grounded Robot Manipulation
  2. 2025SwitchVLA: Execution-Aware Task Switching for Vision-Language-Action Models
  3. 2026HRIBench: Benchmarking Interaction-Centric Human-Robot Collaboration
  4. 2023Model-Based Runtime Monitoring with Interactive Imitation Learning
  5. 2026Foresight: Failure Detection for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation with Action-Conditioned World Model Latents
  6. 2025Can We Detect Failures Without Failure Data? Uncertainty-Aware Runtime Failure Detection for Imitation Learning Policies
  7. 2026SafeStage: Evaluating Safety Before, During, and After Vision-Language-Conditioned Robot Manipulation ↗
  8. 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progress