Training Transformers in Cosine Coefficient Space
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Linear layers hold most of a transformer's parameters. We replace each linear layer with one that stores K out of mn two-dimensional DCT coefficients per weight matrix and reconstructs the full matrix through an inverse DCT at every forward pass; the K coefficients are the trainable parameters. A 4-layer, 128-dim transformer trained from scratch on character-level Shakespeare reaches validation loss 1.604 at K = mn/2, against 1.580 for a standard dense baseline -- a gap of +0.024 at half the trainable parameter count, within the terminal-epoch variation of the dense run. A rank-48 LoRA factorization at the same trainable parameter count reaches only 1.801 (+0.221). The structural advantage of sparse-coefficient over low-rank parameterizations at matched K is qualitative. We identify rank flexibility as the mechanism. A random orthonormal basis matches the DCT within noise at K = mn/2, and a compression sweep through K = mn/10 and K = mn/20 shows that subspaces that can host high-rank matrices keep the loss low, while subspaces that flatten into a low-rank block (zigzag-selection variants) converge onto the observed stable rank and the loss line of the rank-48 LoRA reference in lock-step. Among these orthonormal bases, the DCT is preferred because its separable fast transform admits a fused reconstruction kernel: the materialized weight matrix never leaves on-chip memory, so the parameter saving translates into a bandwidth saving as well.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2026.
Builds on
12 of 15 references.
References · 12
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
- 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 447
- 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 364
- 2021FNet: Mixing Tokens with Fourier Transformscited by 343
- 2024LoRA vs Full Fine-tuning: An Illusion of Equivalencecited by 102
- 2022Monarch: Expressive Structured Matrices for Efficient and Accurate Trainingcited by 100
- 2015Spectral Representations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 79
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Discrete Fourier Transformcited by 67
- 2025RandLoRA: Full-rank parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large modelscited by 34
- 2020Harmonic Convolutional Networks based on Discrete Cosine Transformcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.