Robust Regression with Adaptive Contamination in Response: Optimal Rates and Computational Barriers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study robust regression under a contamination model in which covariates are clean while the responses may be corrupted in an adaptive manner. Unlike the classical Huber's contamination model, where both covariates and responses may be contaminated and consistent estimation is impossible when the contamination proportion is a non-vanishing constant, it turns out that the clean-covariate setting admits strictly improved statistical guarantees. Specifically, we show that the additional information in the clean covariates can be carefully exploited to construct an estimator that achieves a better estimation rate than that attainable under Huber contamination. In contrast to the Huber model, this improved rate implies consistency even when the contamination is a constant. A matching minimax lower bound is established using Fano's inequality together with the construction of contamination processes that match m> 2 distributions simultaneously, extending the previous two-point lower bound argument in Huber's setting. Despite the improvement over the Huber model from an information-theoretic perspective, we provide formal evidence -- in the form of Statistical Query and Low-Degree Polynomial lower bounds -- that the problem exhibits strong information-computation gaps. Our results strongly suggest that the information-theoretic improvements cannot be achieved by polynomial-time algorithms, revealing a fundamental gap between information-theoretic and computational limits in robust regression with clean covariates.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
22 of 38 references.
References · 22
- 2018Sever: A Robust Meta-Algorithm for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 125
- 2016Statistical Query Lower Bounds for Robust Estimation of High-dimensional Gaussians and Gaussian Mixturescited by 115
- 2018Robust Estimation via Robust Gradient Estimationcited by 76
- 2018Efficient Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Robust Linear Regressioncited by 76
- 2014On Iterative Hard Thresholding Methods for High-dimensional M-Estimationcited by 53
- 2020Statistical Query Algorithms and Low-Degree Tests Are Almost Equivalentcited by 51
- 2020Robust regression with covariate filtering: Heavy tails and adversarial contaminationcited by 50
- 2015Robust Covariance and Scatter Matrix Estimation under Huber's Contamination Modelcited by 47
- 2015Robust Regression via Hard Thresholdingcited by 39
- 2020Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Timecited by 32
- 2019Outlier-robust estimation of a sparse linear model using ℓ1-penalized Huber's M-estimatorcited by 31
- 2021Statistical Query Lower Bounds for List-Decodable Linear Regressioncited by 25
10 more
- 2019Adaptive Hard Thresholding for Near-optimal Consistent Robust Regressioncited by 23
- 2017Robust Regression via Mutivariate Regression Depthcited by 20
- 2020Online Robust Regression via SGD on the l1 losscited by 20
- 2023Information-Computation Tradeoffs for Learning Margin Halfspaces with Random Classification Noisecited by 9
- 2013Corrupted Sensing: Novel Guarantees for Separating Structured Signalscited by 7
- 2023Near-Optimal Algorithms for Gaussians with Huber Contamination: Mean Estimation and Linear Regressioncited by 7
- 2019ERM and RERM are optimal estimators for regression problems when malicious outliers corrupt the labelscited by 5
- 2023Near-Optimal Bounds for Learning Gaussian Halfspaces with Random Classification Noisecited by 5
- 2025Algorithms and SQ Lower Bounds for Robustly Learning Real-valued Multi-index Modelscited by 5
- 2022Robust estimation algorithms don't need to know the corruption levelcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.