mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TraceGuard: Structured Multi-Dimensional Monitoring as a Collusion-Resistant Control Protocol

arXiv 2604.03968 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI control protocols use monitors to detect attacks by untrusted AI agents, but standard single-score monitors face two limitations: they miss subtle attacks where outputs look clean but reasoning is off, and they collapse to near-zero safety when the monitor is the same model as the agent (collusion). We present TraceGuard, a structured multi-dimensional monitoring protocol that evaluates agent actions across five dimensions -- goal alignment, constraint adherence, reasoning coherence, safety awareness, and action-trace consistency -- scored in parallel by independent LLM calls, augmented by seven heuristic detectors and an LLM-based intent analyzer. We evaluate on BashArena (637 bash tasks, 4 attack categories) within the ControlArena framework. Our results on 519 samples (279 honest, 240 attack) show that: (1) the hybrid approach achieves clear attack-honest separation (attack mean 0.616 vs. honest mean 0.206, Delta=0.410); (2) structured scoring constrains collusion -- the untrusted structured monitor achieves 95% safety vs. 0% for single-score untrusted monitoring; (3) goal alignment and constraint adherence are the most discriminative dimensions; and (4) a separation-of-duties variant splitting dimensions across trusted and untrusted models achieves 100% safety while preventing any single model from seeing the full evaluation. TraceGuard is implemented as a new monitor type for the open-source ControlArena framework.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.

Builds on

5 of 26 references.

References · 5

  1. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  2. 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 384
  3. 2023AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversioncited by 229
  4. 2025How to evaluate control measures for LLM agents? A trajectory from today to superintelligencecited by 20
  5. 2026When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategiescited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.