Supervised Dimensionality Reduction Revisited: Why LDA on Frozen CNN Features Deserves a Second Look
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Frozen pretrained image representations are widely used for transfer learning: a backbone is kept fixed, feature vectors are extracted, and a lightweight classifier is trained on top. This pipeline usually feeds the full feature vector to the classifier, even when the target task has far fewer classes than the pretraining task. We revisit a classical alternative: supervised dimensionality reduction with Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) before linear probing. We evaluate ten dimensionality-reduction strategies on frozen features from six backbones -- ResNet-18, ResNet-50, MobileNetV3-Small, EfficientNet-B0, ViT-B/16, and DINOv2-ViT-S/14 -- across CIFAR-100, Tiny ImageNet, and CUB-200-2011. Under a fixed logistic-regression protocol, LDA improves accuracy over full features in 11 of 12 coarse-grained configurations, with gains up to 4.5 percentage points while reducing feature dimensionality by 48-87%. The same projection consistently hurts on fine-grained CUB-200, where full features win across all six backbones. This establishes a practical boundary condition: LDA is useful when class-level structure is coarse enough to be captured by mean-separating directions, but it can discard subtle cues needed for fine-grained recognition. We also compare LDA with PCA, PCA+LDA, regularized LDA, Local Fisher Discriminant Analysis, Neighbourhood Components Analysis, and three lightweight LDA extensions. The results show that plain LDA offers the best accuracy-cost tradeoff for most coarse-grained settings, while more complex supervised reduction methods rarely justify their additional cost. Overall, the study provides concrete guidance for when post-hoc supervised projection should, and should not, be inserted into frozen-feature image classification pipelines.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.
Builds on
17 of 49 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
- 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
- 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 424
- 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
5 more
- 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
- 2021Fine-Grained Image Analysis with Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 135
- 2014A survey of dimensionality reduction techniquescited by 50
- 2015Deep Linear Discriminant Analysiscited by 23
- 2020Supervised dimensionality reduction by a Linear Discriminant Analysis on pre-trained CNN featurescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.