Extracting Money Laundering Transactions from Quasi-Temporal Graph Representation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Money laundering presents a persistent challenge for financial institutions worldwide, while criminal organizations constantly evolve their tactics to bypass detection systems. Traditional anti-money laundering approaches mainly rely on predefined risk-based rules, leading to resource-intensive investigations and high numbers of false positive alerts. In order to restrict operational costs from exploding, while billions of transactions are being processed every day, financial institutions are investing in more sophisticated mechanisms to improve existing systems. In this paper, we present ExSTraQt (EXtract Suspicious TRAnsactions from Quasi-Temporal graph representation), an advanced supervised learning approach to detect money laundering (or suspicious) transactions in financial datasets. Our proposed framework excels in performance, when compared to the state-of-the-art AML (Anti Money Laundering) detection models. The key strengths of our framework are sheer simplicity, in terms of design and number of parameters; and scalability, in terms of the computing and memory requirements. We evaluated our framework on transaction-level detection accuracy using a real dataset; and a set of synthetic financial transaction datasets. We consistently achieve an uplift in the F1 score for most datasets, up to 1% for the real dataset; and more than 8% for one of the synthetic datasets. We also claim that our framework could seamlessly complement existing AML detection systems in banks. Our code and datasets are available at https://github.com/mhaseebtariq/exstraqt.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
20 of 37 references.
References · 20
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 964
- 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 477
- 2018From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communitiescited by 379
- 2017Residual Gated Graph ConvNetscited by 341
- 2021Identity-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 197
- 2019Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensicscited by 158
- 2019Approximation Ratios of Graph Neural Networks for Combinatorial Problemscited by 68
8 more
- 2023Realistic Synthetic Financial Transactions for Anti-Money Laundering Modelscited by 47
- 2023Provably Powerful Graph Neural Networks for Directed Multigraphscited by 24
- 2022LaundroGraph: Self-Supervised Graph Representation Learning for Anti-Money Launderingcited by 20
- 2019edGNN: a Simple and Powerful GNN for Directed Labeled Graphscited by 17
- 2023Topology-Agnostic Detection of Temporal Money Laundering Flows in Billion-Scale Transactionscited by 10
- 2025Intelligent Anti-Money Laundering Solution Based upon Novel Community Detection in Massive Transaction Networks on Sparkcited by 2
- 2025Optimizing Blockchain Analysis: Tackling Temporality and Scalability with an Incremental Approach with Metropolis-Hastings Random Walkscited by 1
- 2026Detecting Complex Money Laundering Patterns with Incremental and Distributed Graph Modelingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.