mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revealing the Learning Dynamics of Long-Context Continual Pre-training

arXiv 2604.02650 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing studies on Long-Context Continual Pre-training (LCCP) mainly focus on small-scale models and limited data regimes (tens of billions of tokens). We argue that directly migrating these small-scale settings to industrial-grade models risks insufficient adaptation and premature training termination. Furthermore, current evaluation methods rely heavily on downstream benchmarks (e.g., Needle-in-a-Haystack), which often fail to reflect the intrinsic convergence state and can lead to "deceptive saturation". In this paper, we present the first systematic investigation of LCCP learning dynamics using the industrial-grade Hunyuan-A13B (80B total parameters), tracking its evolution across a 200B-token training trajectory. Specifically, we propose a hierarchical framework to analyze LCCP dynamics across behavioral (supervised fine-tuning probing), probabilistic (perplexity), and mechanistic (attention patterns) levels. Our findings reveal: (1) Necessity of Massive Data Scaling: Training regimes of dozens of billions of tokens are insufficient for industrial-grade LLMs' LCCP (e.g., Hunyuan-A13B reaches saturation after training over 150B tokens). (2) Deceptive Saturation vs. Intrinsic Saturation: Traditional NIAH scores report "fake saturation" early, while our PPL-based analysis reveals continuous intrinsic improvements and correlates more strongly with downstream performance. (3) Mechanistic Monitoring for Training Stability: Retrieval heads act as efficient, low-resource training monitors, as their evolving attention scores reliably track LCCP progress and exhibit high correlation with SFT results. This work provides a comprehensive monitoring framework, evaluation system, and mechanistic interpretation for the LCCP of industrial-grade LLM.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 28 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  4. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  5. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  6. 2022A Survey on In-context Learningcited by 717
  7. 2024LongBench v2: Towards Deeper Understanding and Reasoning on Realistic Long-context Multitaskscited by 367
  8. 2024LongRoPE: Extending LLM Context Window Beyond 2 Million Tokenscited by 302
  9. 2024Retrieval Head Mechanistically Explains Long-Context Factualitycited by 219
  10. 2024How to Train Long-Context Language Models (Effectively)cited by 141
  11. 2024LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMscited by 104
  12. 2024Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queriescited by 85
5 more
  1. 2024One Thousand and One Pairs: A "novel" challenge for long-context language modelscited by 80
  2. 2024A Benchmark for Long-Form Medical Question Answeringcited by 25
  3. 2024On the Impacts of Contexts on Repository-Level Code Generationcited by 21
  4. 2025A Controllable Examination for Long-Context Language Modelscited by 7
  5. 2025BOSE: A Systematic Evaluation Method Optimized for Base Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.