mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AIVV: Neuro-Symbolic LLM Agent-Integrated Verification and Validation for Trustworthy Autonomous Systems

arXiv 2604.02478 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning models excel at detecting anomaly patterns in normal data. However, they do not provide a direct solution for anomaly classification and scalability across diverse control systems, frequently failing to distinguish genuine faults from nuisance faults caused by noise or the control system's large transient response. Consequently, because algorithmic fault validation remains unscalable, full Verification and Validation (V&V) operations are still managed by Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) analysis, resulting in an unsustainable manual workload. To automate this essential oversight, we propose Agent-Integrated Verification and Validation (AIVV), a hybrid framework that deploys Large Language Models (LLMs) as a deliberative outer loop. Because rigorous system verification strictly depends on accurate validation, AIVV escalates mathematically flagged anomalies to a role-specialized LLM council. The council agents perform collaborative validation by semantically validating nuisance and true failures based on natural-language (NL) requirements to secure a high-fidelity system-verification baseline. Building on this foundation, the council then performs system verification by assessing post-fault responses against NL operational tolerances, ultimately generating actionable V&V artifacts, such as gain-tuning proposals. Experiments on a time-series simulator for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) demonstrate that AIVV successfully digitizes the HITL V&V process, overcoming the limitations of rule-based fault classification and offering a scalable blueprint for LLM-mediated oversight in time-series data domains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2026.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AgentGuard: Runtime Verification of AI Agents28 Sep

Other references · 12

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  3. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  4. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  5. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
  6. 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
  7. 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 407
  8. 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 348
  9. 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 211
  10. 2017Human-in-the-loop Artificial Intelligencecited by 40
  11. 2025When and Why Does Multi-Agent Debate Fail and Does It Really Underperform?cited by 4
  12. 2025DURA-CPS: A Multi-Role Orchestrator for Dependability Assurance in LLM-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026FormalJudge: A Neuro-Symbolic Paradigm for Agentic Oversight
  2. 2026AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems
  3. 2025An Approach to Checking Correctness for Agentic Systems
  4. 2025VeriGuard: Enhancing LLM Agent Safety via Verified Code Generation
  5. 2026Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems
  6. 2025SV-LLM: An Agentic Approach for SoC Security Verification using Large Language Models
  7. 2025Fault2Flow: An AlphaEvolve-Optimized Human-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent System for Fault-to-Workflow Automation
  8. 2026Behavioral Integrity Verification for AI Agent Skills