mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analysis of LLM Performance on AWS Bedrock: Receipt-item Categorisation Case Study

arXiv 2604.01615 ↗First posted 2 Apr 2026cs.AI cs.SEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a systematic, cost-aware evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for receipt-item categorisation within a production-oriented classification framework. We compare four instruction-tuned models available through AWS Bedrock: Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 4 Sonnet, Mixtral 8x7B Instruct, and Mistral 7B Instruct. The aim of the study was (1) to assess performance across accuracy, response stability, and token-level cost, and (2) to investigate what prompting methods, zero-shot or few-shot, are especially appropriate both in terms of accuracy and in terms of incurred costs. Results of our experiments demonstrated that Claude 3.7 Sonnet achieves the most favourable balance between classification accuracy and cost efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2026.

Builds on

9 of 32 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  3. 2024Best Practices for Text Annotation with Large Language Modelscited by 36
  4. 2024TnT-LLM: Text Mining at Scale with Large Language Modelscited by 26
  5. 2024Knowledge Distillation in Automated Annotation: Supervised Text Classification with LLM-Generated Training Labelscited by 25
  6. 2024Enhancing Text Classification through LLM-Driven Active Learning and Human Annotationcited by 20
  7. 2024Evaluating Students' Open-ended Written Responses with LLMs: Using the RAG Framework for GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Claude-3, and Mistral-Largecited by 6
  8. 2019Easy Mobile Meter Reading for Non-Smart Meters: Comparison of AWS Rekognition and Google Cloud Vision Approachescited by 2
  9. 2025Visualisation for the CIS benchmark scanning resultscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.