mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing Pause Thresholds for empirical Translation Process Research

arXiv 2604.01410 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text production (and translations) proceeds in the form of stretches of typing, interrupted by keystroke pauses. It is often assumed that fast typing reflects unchallenged/automated translation production while long(er) typing pauses are indicative of translation problems, hurdles or difficulties. Building on a long discussion concerning the determination of pause thresholds that separate automated from presumably reflective translation processes (O'Brien, 2006; Alves and Vale, 2009; Timarova et al., 2011; Dragsted and Carl, 2013; Lacruz et al., 2014; Kumpulainen, 2015; Heilmann and Neumann 2016), this paper compares five approaches for computing these pause thresholds, and suggest and evaluate a novel method for computing Production Unit Breaks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

2 of 15 references.

References · 2

  1. 2025The Behavioural Translation Style Space: Towards simulating the temporal dynamics of affect, behaviour, and cognition in human translation productioncited by 2
  2. 2026Hylog: A Hybrid Approach to Logging Text Production in Non-alphabetic Scriptscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.