mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NeuroDDAF: Neural Dynamic Diffusion-Advection Fields with Evidential Fusion for Air Quality Forecasting

arXiv 2604.01175 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate air quality forecasting is crucial for protecting public health and guiding environmental policy, yet it remains challenging due to nonlinear spatiotemporal dynamics, wind-driven transport, and distribution shifts across regions. Physics-based models are interpretable but computationally expensive and often rely on restrictive assumptions, whereas purely data-driven models can be accurate but may lack robustness and calibrated uncertainty. To address these limitations, we propose Neural Dynamic Diffusion-Advection Fields (NeuroDDAF), a physics-informed forecasting framework that unifies neural representation learning with open-system transport modeling. NeuroDDAF integrates (i) a GRU-Graph Attention encoder to capture temporal dynamics and wind-aware spatial interactions, (ii) a Fourier-domain diffusion-advection module with learnable residuals, (iii) a wind-modulated latent Neural ODE to model continuous-time evolution under time-varying connectivity, and (iv) an evidential fusion mechanism that adaptively combines physics-guided and neural forecasts while quantifying uncertainty. Experiments on four urban datasets (Beijing, Shenzhen, Tianjin, and Ancona) across 1-3 day horizons show that NeuroDDAF consistently outperforms strong baselines, including AirPhyNet, achieving up to 9.7% reduction in RMSE and 9.4% reduction in MAE on long-term forecasts. On the Beijing dataset, NeuroDDAF attains an RMSE of 41.63 μg/m3 for 1-day prediction and 48.88 μg/m3 for 3-day prediction, representing the best performance among all compared methods. In addition, NeuroDDAF improves cross-city generalization and yields well-calibrated uncertainty estimates, as confirmed by ensemble variance analysis and case studies under varying wind conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2026.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  2. 2017Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecastingcited by 1,125
  3. 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 362
  4. 2019Towards Physics-informed Deep Learning for Turbulent Flow Predictioncited by 203
  5. 2021Discrete Graph Structure Learning for Forecasting Multiple Time Seriescited by 169
  6. 2020Learning Long-Term Dependencies in Irregularly-Sampled Time Seriescited by 82
  7. 2022Spatio-Temporal Self-Supervised Learning for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 77
  8. 2022AirFormer: Predicting Nationwide Air Quality in China with Transformerscited by 73
  9. 2018Physics Guided RNNs for Modeling Dynamical Systems: A Case Study in Simulating Lake Temperature Profilescited by 55
  10. 2022STDEN: Towards Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Traffic Flow Predictioncited by 45
  11. 2020Joint Air Quality and Weather Prediction Based on Multi-Adversarial Spatiotemporal Networkscited by 39
  12. 2024AirPhyNet: Harnessing Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Air Quality Predictioncited by 25
5 more
  1. 2024Air Quality Prediction with Physics-Guided Dual Neural ODEs in Open Systemscited by 25
  2. 2023Novel Physics-Based Machine-Learning Models for Indoor Air Quality Approximationscited by 7
  3. 2023Physics-Informed Deep Learning to Reduce the Bias in Joint Prediction of Nitrogen Oxidescited by 5
  4. 2025Graph-Based Physics-Guided Urban PM2.5 Air Quality Imputation with Constrained Monitoring Datacited by 3
  5. 2022Physics-Informed Graph Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.