mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Autonomous Adaptive Solver Selection for Chemistry Integration via Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2604.00264 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The computational cost of stiff chemical kinetics remains a dominant bottleneck in reacting-flow simulation, yet hybrid integration strategies are typically driven by hand-tuned heuristics or supervised predictors that make myopic decisions from instantaneous local state. We introduce a constrained reinforcement learning (RL) framework that autonomously selects between an implicit BDF integrator (CVODE) and a quasi-steady-state (QSS) solver during chemistry integration. Solver selection is cast as a Markov decision process. The agent learns trajectory-aware policies that account for how present solver choices influence downstream error accumulation, while minimizing computational cost under a user-prescribed accuracy tolerance enforced through a Lagrangian reward with online multiplier adaptation. Across sampled 0D homogeneous reactor conditions, the RL-adaptive policy achieves a mean speedup of approximately 3×, with speedups ranging from 1.11× to 10.58×, while maintaining accurate ignition delays and species profiles for a 106-species textitn-dodecane mechanism and adding approximately 1% inference overhead. Without retraining, the 0D-trained policy transfers to 1D counterflow diffusion flames over strain rates 10--2000~s-1, delivering consistent ≈ 2.2× speedup relative to CVODE while preserving near-reference temperature accuracy and selecting CVODE at only 12--15% of space-time points. Overall, the results demonstrate the potential of the proposed reinforcement learning framework to learn problem-specific integration strategies while respecting accuracy constraints, thereby opening a pathway toward adaptive, self-optimizing workflows for multiphysics systems with spatially heterogeneous stiffness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

12 of 48 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  5. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  6. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  7. 2020Learning Algebraic Multigrid Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 54
  8. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Mesh Refinementcited by 37
  9. 2020ChemNODE: A Neural Ordinary Differential Equations Approach for Chemical Kinetics Solverscited by 26
  10. 2022Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Mesh Refinementcited by 19
  11. 2023Swarm Reinforcement Learning For Adaptive Mesh Refinementcited by 16
  12. 2024A reinforcement learning strategy to automate and accelerate h/p-multigrid solverscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.