mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feature-level Site Leakage Reduction for Cross-Hospital Chest X-ray Transfer via Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2604.00263 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026eess.IV cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-hospital failure in chest X-ray models is often attributed to domain shift, yet most work assumes invariance without measuring it. This paper studies how to measure site leakage directly and how that measurement changes conclusions about transfer methods. We study multi-site self-supervised learning (SSL) and feature-level adversarial site confusion for cross-hospital transfer. We pretrain a ResNet-18 on NIH and CheXpert without pathology labels. We then freeze the encoder and train a linear pneumonia classifier on NIH only, evaluating transfer to RSNA. We quantify site leakage using a post hoc linear probe that predicts acquisition site from frozen backbone features f and projection features z. Across 3 random seeds, multi-site SSL improves RSNA AUC from 0.6736 ± 0.0148 (ImageNet initialization) to 0.7804 ± 0.0197. Adding adversarial site confusion on f reduces measured leakage but does not reliably improve AUC and increases variance. On f, site probe accuracy drops from 0.9890 ± 0.0021 (SSL-only) to 0.8504 ± 0.0051 (CanonicalF), where chance is 0.50. On z, probe accuracy drops from 0.8912 ± 0.0092 to 0.7810 ± 0.0250. These results show that measuring leakage changes how transfer methods should be interpreted: multi-site SSL drives transfer, while adversarial confusion exposes the limits of invariance assumptions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

12 of 29 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  3. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  4. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  5. 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 972
  6. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  7. 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
  8. 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
  9. 2020Self supervised contrastive learning for digital histopathologycited by 146
  10. 2025Domain-invariant feature learning in brain MR imaging for content-based image retrievalcited by 3
  11. 2025Adaptive Frequency Domain Alignment Network for Medical image segmentationcited by 2
  12. 2024Multimodal Learning for Scalable Representation of High-Dimensional Medical Datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Resolution scaling governs DINOv3 transfer performance in chest radiograph classification
  2. 2026Text-Guided Diffusion-Based Adversarial Attacks on Chest X-Ray Images
  3. 2025DiSSECT: Structuring Transfer-Ready Medical Image Representations through Discrete Self-Supervision
  4. 2023Exploring Image Augmentations for Siamese Representation Learning with Chest X-Rays
  5. 2026A data- and compute-efficient chest X-ray foundation model beyond aggressive scaling
  6. 2026Confidence-Gated Cloud-Edge Cascade Triage via Variational Risk Minimization for Medical Imaging
  7. 2023Unlearning Spurious Correlations in Chest X-ray Classification
  8. 2021UniMiSS: Universal Medical Self-Supervised Learning via Breaking Dimensionality Barrier