REM-CTX: Automated Peer Review via Reinforcement Learning with Auxiliary Context
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most automated peer review systems rely on textual manuscript content alone, leaving visual elements such as figures and external scholarly signals underutilized. We introduce REM-CTX, a reinforcement-learning system that incorporates auxiliary context into the review generation process via correspondence-aware reward functions. REM-CTX trains an 8B-parameter language model with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) and combines a multi-aspect quality reward with two correspondence rewards that explicitly encourage alignment with auxiliary context. Experiments on manuscripts across Computer, Biological, and Physical Sciences show that REM-CTX achieves the highest overall review quality among six baselines, outperforming other systems with substantially larger commercial models, and surpassing the next-best RL baseline across both quality and contextual grounding metrics. Ablation studies confirm that the two correspondence rewards are complementary: each selectively improves its targeted correspondence reward while preserving all quality dimensions, and the full model outperforms all partial variants. Analysis of training dynamics reveals that the criticism aspect is negatively correlated with other metrics during training, suggesting that future studies should group multi-dimension rewards for review generation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 22 references.
References · 14
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
- 2024Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and Inferencecited by 527
- 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
- 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generationcited by 286
- 2023Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysiscited by 195
- 2018A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applicationscited by 135
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Paperscited by 98
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RL
- 2026ReviewGuard: Aligning LLM-Assisted Peer Review with Long-Term Scientific Impact
- 2026InternReviewer & InternAdvocate: Objective Reward and Evaluation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Peer Review and Rebuttal
- 2025MMReview: A Multidisciplinary and Multimodal Benchmark for LLM-Based Peer Review Automation
- 2026From Passive Generation to Investigation: A Proactive Scientific Peer Review Agent
- 2026ScholarPeer: A Context-Aware Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Peer Review
- 2026RbtAct: Rebuttal as Supervision for Actionable Review Feedback Generation
- 2025AI and the Future of Academic Peer Review