mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are they human? Detecting large language models by probing human memory constraints

arXiv 2604.00016 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The validity of online behavioral research relies on study participants being human rather than machine. In the past, it was possible to detect machines by posing simple challenges that were easily solved by humans but not by machines. General-purpose agents based on large language models (LLMs) can now solve many of these challenges, threatening the validity of online behavioral research. Here we explore the idea of detecting humanness by using tasks that machines can solve too well to be human. Specifically, we probe for the existence of an established human cognitive constraint: limited working memory capacity. We show that cognitive modeling on a standard serial recall task can be used to distinguish online participants from LLMs even when the latter are specifically instructed to mimic human working memory constraints. Our results demonstrate that it is viable to use well-established cognitive phenomena to distinguish LLMs from humans.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.

Builds on

6 of 26 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  3. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  4. 2023YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Modelscited by 601
  5. 2024The Illusion-Illusion: Vision Language Models See Illusions Where There Are Nonecited by 14
  6. 2025Recognising, Anticipating, and Mitigating LLM Pollution of Online Behavioural Researchcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.