Task Scarcity and Label Leakage in Relational Transfer Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training relational foundation models requires learning representations that transfer across tasks, yet available supervision is typically limited to a small number of prediction targets per database. This task scarcity causes learned representations to encode task-specific shortcuts that degrade transfer even within the same schema, a problem we call label leakage. We study this using K-Space, a modular architecture combining frozen pretrained tabular encoders with a lightweight message-passing core. To suppress leakage, we introduce a gradient projection method that removes label-predictive directions from representation updates. On RelBench, this improves within-dataset transfer by +0.145 AUROC on average, often recovering near single-task performance. Our results suggest that limited task diversity, not just limited data, constrains relational foundation models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 11 references.
References · 10
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
- 2021Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representationscited by 326
- 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 267
- 2024RelBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning on Relational Databasescited by 90
- 2023Relational Deep Learning: Graph Representation Learning on Relational Databasescited by 55
- 2025Griffin: Towards a Graph-Centric Relational Database Foundation Modelcited by 41
- 2025Relational Transformer: Toward Zero-Shot Foundation Models for Relational Datacited by 32
- 2024Scalable Message Passing Neural Networks: No Need for Attention in Large Graph Representation Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.