mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Variational Graph Neural Networks for Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Problems

arXiv 2603.29515 ↗First posted 31 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasingly wide use of deep machine learning techniques in computational mechanics has significantly accelerated simulations of problems that were considered unapproachable just a few years ago. However, in critical applications such as Digital Twins for engineering or medicine, fast responses are not enough; reliable results must also be provided. In certain cases, traditional deterministic methods may not be optimal as they do not provide a measure of confidence in their predictions or results, especially in inverse problems where the solution may not be unique or the initial data may not be entirely reliable due to the presence of noise, for instance. Classic deep neural networks also lack a clear measure to quantify the uncertainty of their predictions. In this work, we present a variational graph neural network (VGNN) architecture that integrates variational layers into its architecture to model the probability distribution of weights. Unlike computationally expensive full Bayesian networks, our approach strategically introduces variational layers exclusively in the decoder, allowing us to estimate cognitive uncertainty and statistical uncertainty at a relatively lower cost. In this work, we validate the proposed methodology in two cases of solid mechanics: the identification of the value of the elastic modulus with nonlinear distribution in a 2D elastic problem and the location and quantification of the loads applied to a 3D hyperelastic beam, in both cases using only the displacement field of each test as input data. The results show that the model not only recovers the physical parameters with high precision, but also provides confidence intervals consistent with the physics of the problem, as well as being able to locate the position of the applied load and estimate its value, giving a confidence interval for that experiment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 23 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
  2. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
  3. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
  4. 2017Advances in Variational Inferencecited by 236
  5. 2020Variational Autoencoders for Learning Nonlinear Dynamics of Physical Systemscited by 50
  6. 2023A graph convolutional autoencoder approach to model order reduction for parametrized PDEscited by 44
  7. 2022Thermodynamics-informed graph neural networkscited by 33
  8. 2024On the feasibility of foundational models for the simulation of physical phenomenacited by 7
  9. 2020Inverse Estimation of Elastic Modulus Using Physics-Informed Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 4
  10. 2025On the under-reaching phenomenon in message-passing neural PDE solvers: revisiting the CFL conditioncited by 4
  11. 2025Bridging Data and Physics: A Graph Neural Network-Based Hybrid Twin Frameworkcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.